CC_Minutes_2014_0609 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 9, 2014 Page 17 moved one step from residents for non-elected officials to make decisions. Coun- cilmember Laliberte noted that she understood the rationale based on past history of why such a board was desired, but remained hesitant. Councilmember Laliber- te stated that she'd prefer to meet more often with the Commission as suggested to stay on top of things of concern to them as a starting point if it was the desire of the City Council rather than establishing Park Board. Councilmember Laliberte opined if by meeting more often, especially with initiation of the Park Renewal Program projects, it would avoid the reason why a $19 million Park Renewal Pro- ject was necessary to address things done being done when they should have been done. Councilmember McGehee agreed with Councilmember Laliberte's comments for meeting more often, stating that she would not favor a Park Board at this time for many of those same reasons, for the need for the City Council to retain that direct relationship with residents and avoid the autonomy of a Board and its own taxing authority. Councilmember McGehee opined that parks are a resource for the en- tire community, and when the Master Plan process was underway, stated that she personally supported a referendum and opined that the City failed its residents in not pursuing a referendum. Even though 3,000 people participated in the Master Plan process, Councilmember McGehee noted that this was less than 10% of the overall Roseville population; with the 2014 community survey indicating that 70% of the respondents didn't know about the Park Renewal Program, even though there were residents and the reason for them not using the parks might mean that their needs are not being met even though a large expenditure of public money had been made in the park system. Councilmember McGehee stated that she felt strongly that more public airing of the Renewal Program was needed to determine what the real issues were, but what was being done now and the subsequent maintenance needed for those buildings, were not addressed or supported in either the 2011 or 2014 community surveys. Councilmember McGehee stated that she would like to meet more often and have more detail on the projects underway to address the different points of view of individual Councilmembers, and to have a give and take discussion about projects and ongoing maintenance, allowing the Commission and City Council to keep track of resident needs and the use of public funds to meet those needs. After having participated for years in the public airing of issues in his former role on the Parks & Recreation Commission, Councilmember Etten opined that noth- ing in Roseville's history had been as well-vetted as this Park Renewal Program process. Councilmember Etten opined that to state that it hadn't gone through a public process was not correct. Councilmember Etten admitted that he had been caught off guard by community survey responses about their perceived lack of knowledge about the Renewal Program, but while not sure what had led to that, suggested that it may have been the label of the program from "Park Master Plan"