CC_Minutes_2014_0609 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,June 9,2014 Page 36 Mayor Roe questioned if the desire was to be so specific by adding additional re- quirements, since the building permit process drove those issues and nothing was needed in addition to that process. Councilmember Laliberte concurred with Mayor Roe's observation, and while it was beneficial to address these things, if they were already addressed in other are- as or standards in code, there was no reason to add another layer in. Councilmember McGehee opined that they were not addressed in other areas (e.g. ADA and sprinklers) and that she was not talking about this for any purpose other than this CU currently before the Council. Mayor Roe noted that this particular use had already demonstrated the status for ADA and sprinklers, and therefore, didn't need to be part of this consideration to- night. If just specific to this tonight, Councilmember McGehee asked the City Attorney to respond to the question of Mr. Paschke and her. City Attorney Bartholdi stated that the City had a contract with the PUD, and it could be amended and have conditions added; however, he noted that the City no longer had a PUD district anymore, and the current PUD could be amended as long as it was mutually agreed upon by both parties. Specific to including sprin- klers and ADA compliance as a condition when it is addressed under the building code, that would depend on whether the building code applied to re-used build- ings or only to new construction, which may need to be clarified. Mayor Roe noted that if a building wasn't already compliant, it may be tied to use, not new construction; and in this instance, the building was already compli- ant, so any amendment should be a consideration for future discussion. Councilmember McGehee opined that it would be easy to craft a simple agree- ment between the City and Northwestern to amend the PUD for this use; and stat- ed that she was prepared to say parking was adequate and since the building had elevators and sprinklers, it would be a simple solution to amend the existing PUD in that manner and get an agreement by both parties. Etten moved, Willmus seconded, enactment of Ordinance No. 1469 (Attachment B) entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Selected Text of Title 10, Zoning Ordi- nance of the Roseville City Code;"excluding the Residential/Family Living Uses and Civic/Institutional Uses and referenced; and correcting height references in Section 4.12.a from 45'to 40'(Line 30). Councilmember Etten opined that he would like to take staffs suggestion to move forward in leaving this as a permitted use to allow Northwestern to move forward;