Laserfiche WebLink
accepting garden operator applications. Cautioning that, due to many unknowns <br /> at this point, and based on the value of solar vs. retail rates and competitive <br /> advantages among developers, Ms. McKeown opined that it may be August of <br /> September before the final rule and acceptance of applications were accepted, <br /> which would be on a first come, first served basis. <br /> As noted by Mr. Schwartz, Ms. McKeown noted that the reason for the limited <br /> number was that only a certain number of subscriptions would be accepted per <br /> year for solar gardens, otherwise it may become overwhelming for the current <br /> structure and industry. <br /> If the City was to consider solar arrays for the community, Ms. McKeown noted <br /> some of the considerations needed to be: what was needed to make the project <br /> possible (e.g. 30%tax equity partner); choice of a developer that had staying <br /> power, listened to the needs, and provided maintenance and insurance coverage; <br /> the need to have a minimum of five subscribers; and the minimum purchase <br /> amount of 200 watts, but no more than 120% of electric use. <br /> Ms. McKeown reviewed some of the challenges for the community, including: <br /> clarifying the community values upfront (e.g. will only a local contractor be <br /> considered, and must the product be manufactured in MN); identifying a host site <br /> that has good solar access and a structurally sound roof with relatively easy <br /> access; and finding the 30%tax equity owner if you are an entity that doesn't pay <br /> taxes. <br /> Ms. McKeown reviewed some of the responsibilities for a solar garden operator, <br /> including a copy of the solar panel warranty; a copy of the garden operator's <br /> production projections and a description of the methodology used by the operator <br /> to develop those projections; and disclosure of future costs and benefits of a solar <br /> garden subscription to name a few. <br /> At the request of Member Seigler, Ms. McKeown reviewed other energy options <br /> offered by Xcel Energy, including wind source, and potential to purchase wind <br /> and/or solar energy, with solar probably proving more expensive; and ability to <br /> transfer solar energy credits to others with some stipulations. <br /> As another resource for the City or community members, Ms. McKeown advised <br /> that the Minnesota Renewable Energy Society met on the second Thursday of <br /> each month at 6:00 p.m. at the Mayflower Church in So. Minneapolis; additional <br /> solar classes were available by visiting the MMES website or the CERTS website <br /> and keying in "metro" and "solar"; and offered to research any other resources of <br /> interest, with many already available at: http://SolarGardens/MnCERTs.org. <br /> At the request of Member Cihacek, Ms. McKeown clarified that any one entity <br /> can own up to 40% of the solar garden, but if it was a city or non-tax entity, it <br /> would not qualify for credits. At the further request of Member Cihacek, Ms. <br /> Page 7 of 20 <br />