My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02654
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2600
>
pf_02654
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:02:27 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:14:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2654
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
1828 DRAPER DR
Applicant
FINNEY, HARLAN AND MARIE
Status
APPROVED
PIN
162923240071
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />8[P6~ <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5-23-93 <br /> <br />ITEM NO.: B-6 <br /> <br />;;¡;¡äìPProvw: <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Harlan and Marie Finney request for a minor variance at 1828 <br />Draper Avenue. <br /> <br />Backtzround <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that driveways be setback at least 5 feet from side lot <br />lines. <br /> <br />2, Because of the street improvements currently underway by the City of Roseville, <br />Mr. and Mrs. Finney's driveway is not in compliance and requires a 21 foot minor <br />variance. To bring the driveway into compliance would require reconstruction to <br />a point within 30 feet of the Fairview Avenue right-of-way. The Finney driveway <br />is unique in that it has an inlaid brick design. <br /> <br />3. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval of the <br />variance. It was the Committee's belief that to reconstruct the driveway would <br />create a hardship for the owners. <br /> <br />4, All affected adjacent property owners indicated their approval of the proposed <br />varIance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />'1. Deny the variance based on the finding that no hardship or practical difficulty <br />exists on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or practical difficulty is <br />present on the site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.