My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02655
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2600
>
pf_02655
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:02:30 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:14:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2655
Planning Files - Type
Minor Variance
Address
2200 DRAPER AVE
Applicant
POOLADIANKARI, NASSER
Status
APPROVED
PIN
172923130041
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />g,rl/J <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> <br />DATE: 5-23-93 <br /> <br />ITEM NO.: B-7 <br /> <br />Department Approval: <br /> <br />__À'þ <br /> <br />Manager Reviewed: <br /> <br />Agenda Section: <br /> <br />Consent <br /> <br />Item Description: <br /> <br />Nasser PooladianKari and Martha Hardesty request for a minor <br />variance at 2200 Draper Avenue. <br /> <br />Backg:round <br /> <br />1. City ordinances require that garages be setback at least 30 feet from rear property <br />lines. <br /> <br />2. Mr. PooladianKari and Ms. Hardesty plan to add a new 3-car garage on their <br />property that will require a 4 foot rear yard minor variance and a 1 foot front yard <br />variance, construct a new driveway which will enter from Rosedale Drive, and <br />turn the existing tuck under garage into an additional bedroom for their autistic <br />child. <br /> <br />3. The Minor Variance Committee unanimously recommended approval of the <br />variance. It was the Committee's belief that the location of the new garage will <br />allow the owner to accomodate the needs of their autistic child and will also save <br />a bearing apple tree and mature grape vines on their property. <br /> <br />4. All affected adjacent property owners indicated their approval of the proposed <br />vanance. <br /> <br />Alternatives: <br /> <br />1. Deny the variance based on the fmding that no hardship or practical difficulty <br />exists on the site. <br /> <br />2. Grant the variance based on the finding that a hardship or practical difficulty is <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.