My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02661
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2600
>
pf_02661
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:03:03 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:14:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2661
Planning Files - Type
Special Use Permit
Address
2459 RICE ST
Applicant
SPIERS, TERRY/RAY ROTH LTD.
PIN
112923430039
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />Wednesday~ June 8, 1994 <br /> <br />MINUTES <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Sandstrom, Rengel~ Thomas, Wall~ Wietecki, Harms, <br />Roberts <br /> <br />~ayes: ~one <br /> <br />('eo) PlaRning FUe 2668 <br /> <br />Ro eville Good Samaritan Center requests a front yard setback building varian 0 <br />Sectl 8.020 and 8.130 of the RoseviIle City Code. The project is located 1415 West <br />County oad B. <br /> <br /> <br />Chairman K . h Wietecki opened the public hearing and requested chael Falk to <br />provide a back ouod report on the project. Michael Falk repo a that the Roseville <br />Good Samaritan enter is proposing a major renovation~ and at a front-yard driveway <br />setback variance 0 feet is requested; whereas, the city c e requires 15 feet. The front <br />of the building entranc will need a variance of 5 feet to ow a 25 foot setback where the <br />code requires 30 feet. FI Hy, the canopy in front of e front entry will require a variance <br />of 23 feet if constructed as rrently proposed 7 fe from the front property line. This <br />will require a 23 foot front ya setback for the nopy. <br /> <br />Three trees would be removed. <br />of the front driveway. <br /> <br /> <br />proved the driveway entrance into the turning <br /> <br />Ramsey County has reviewed the 51 <br />lane on County Road B. <br /> <br />The Planning Staffrecomm ded approval ofthe va . nces because of the lack of <br />alternatives and the need" create a more functionaJ IT t face for the building. <br /> <br />A general discus5io . mong Planning Commission members d staff ensued regarding the <br />safety and feasibil' of the driveway entrance lane into the tu . g lane on County Road <br />B. <br /> <br />Member Tomas asked about other setback variances for canopies. . k Jopke responded <br />that the Ity has granted variances to alJow variances to set within 5 to eet of the front <br />prope y line in the past. <br /> <br />sist Engineer Lon Aune explained that. while the county has approved the dn way <br />~ess hecause..øf.t-be-lew-voiume-öfmrft1c;-a-"StOp-sign-wit)--be-plftßsà..in..t~ to <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.