My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02696
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2600
>
pf_02696
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:04:53 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:15:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2696
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2720 FAIRVIEW AVE N
Applicant
ONECOMM CORPORATION
Status
APPROVED
PIN
042923430002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />LAW OFFICES OF <br />PETERSON, BELL, CONVERSE & JENSEN, P.A. <br /> <br />Erwin A. Peterson <br />Robert C. Bell <br />Willard L. Converse <br />Roger A. Jensen <br />Kurt F. Walther <br />James C. Erickson* <br />David S. Anderson <br />Thomas D. McCormick* <br />Carol A. Baldwin <br />Scott B. Crossman <br />Carolìne Bell Beckman <br />Cindy L. Davis <br /> <br />3000 Metropolitan Centre <br />333 South Seventh Street <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402-2441 <br /> <br />Telephone (612) 342-2323 <br />Facsimile (612) 344-1535 <br /> <br />NORTH SUBURBAN OFFICE <br />310 Roseda1e Towers <br />1700 West Highway 36 <br />Roseville, MN 5Sn3-40lS <br /> <br />tALso admlUcd. In Wisconsin <br /> <br />July 22, 1994 <br /> <br />REPLY TO MINNEAPOLIS <br /> <br />Mr. Mike Falk <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, Minnesota 55113 <br /> <br />Re: Our File No. 1011-19 <br /> <br />Dear Mike: <br /> <br />You have asked for an opinion regarding the types of matters which <br />could be considered by the Planning Commission and City Council to <br />determine if there is an adverse impact on adjoining or adjacent <br />property created by a radio or TV tower. The following is a <br />nonexclusive list of such matters which could be legitimately <br />considered by the council: <br /> <br />1. Interference with public safety communication systems. <br /> <br />2. Potential danger to property and persons in the event of <br />structural failure. <br /> <br />3. Nuisance created by warning lights on structure. <br /> <br />4, Interference with electronics or communications equipment used <br />by nearby property owners. <br /> <br />5. Interference with air traffic in the area (e.g" medical <br />center with helipad nearby) . <br /> <br />I recommend that you notify nearby property owners of the applica- <br />tion. It may very well be that neighbors in the area would be <br />adversely affected in a manner not contemplated by us at this time. <br />They should be given the opportunity to express their concerns to <br />the Planning Commission and Council. <br /> <br />M~' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.