My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02720
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02720
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:06:19 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:38:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2720
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
RFP 35W/36
PIN
142923220048
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br /> <br />c, At the meeting, Tom Hauschild and Rich Zabel! will summarize, compare, <br />and contrast the proposals and the city's ownership option for the Council. <br />(If developers submit a number of options, the consultants will meet <br />individually with the developers to define which option best fits the site so <br />that additional review can be done.) <br /> <br />d. The consultants will provide an overview of the industrial and office <br />market in the 1-35W north metro area and assumptions that must be made <br />regarding development in Centre Pointe and Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />e. The consultants and the Council should discuss the possibility of breaking <br />the project into separate pieces or phases of development. <br /> <br />f. The staff will suggest the next steps in the process for reviewing the <br />proposals, <br /> <br />4. Thursday, December 12, 1996, 4:00 - 6:00 pm, - financial impact analysis <br />review and comparison of city benefits from each proposal (Zabel! and Staff) <br /> <br />5. Wednesday, December 18,1996, 4:00 - 6:00 pm, - review of the actual <br />developments, markets that they may reach, and businesses they may attract. <br />Suggestions of questions/comments that should be addressed in interviews. <br />(Tegra and Staff) <br /> <br />6. Wednesday, January 8, 1997,4:00 - 6:00 pm, - interviews - a 20 minute <br />presentation by each developers and an opportunity to answer Council and <br />consultant questions regarding project details, <br /> <br />7. Wednesday, January 22, 1997,4:00 - 6:00 pm, - Recommendations and for <br />preliminary selection; Council direction to negotiate a preliminary agreement. <br />Formal action could be taken on January 27th. <br /> <br />8. After the selection of a development team, the City and the developer will need <br />time to complete negotiation of a development agreement. This may take up to <br />60 days, reporting back to the Council on February 24th or March 10, 1997. The <br />progress on the agreement will be reported, <br /> <br />9, If a developer is officially designated, the developer must apply (and go through <br />hearings) for the PUD rezoning, subdivision, utility, ponding, and road design, <br />The strategy of these approvals should be discussed by the Council and staff to <br />determine whether this necessary part of the development can occur <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.