My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0714_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0714_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 3:59:32 PM
Creation date
7/10/2014 12:46:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
168
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�'I�c�Morris f����������f,°������e �_°�����������y;� <br />July, 2014 <br />Conclusions: <br />In general, Roseville citizens are very satisfied with their community, and very high ratings on <br />most aspects of city operations are commonplace. The key issues facing decision-makers in the <br />future are addressing perceptions about "rising crime" and "aging infrastructure, particularly <br />road and streets." Property tax levels are a secondary concern, but still a limiting factor. <br />Community development efforts should focus on attracting younger residents to the community <br />while also helping seniors stay in the community, since two moderate concerns are the lack of <br />starter homes for young families and the lack of assisted living opportunities for seniors. <br />Information levels about City Government activities are very high in comparison with <br />neighboring communities. Positive ratings of both the Mayor and City Council and City Staff <br />are at the top of the Metropolitan Area. "Roseville City News," the city's newsletter, is <br />exceptionally well regarded: it possesses a higher readership and effectiveness ratings than most <br />peer communities. <br />Citizens are clearly enthusiastic about their City. With the "City Booster" percentage at 24%, or <br />four times the suburban norm, a large reservoir of goodwill has been established; this will serve <br />decision-makers, in particular, very well as new issues are encountered and relatively tough <br />decisions must be made. <br />Methodology: <br />This study contains the results of a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected residents of the City of Roseville. <br />Survey responses were gathered by professional interviewers across the community between April 14th and 30`� <br />2014. The average interview took 27 minutes. All respondents interviewed in this study were part of a randomly <br />generated sample of adult residents of the City of Roseville. In general, random samples such as this yield results <br />projectable to their respective universe within f 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. <br />% <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.