Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 7, 2014 <br /> Page 35 <br /> as the City Council may come to a decision if the PUD criteria was applied, it <br /> may as well be added to that particular zoning district, which he noted was the at- <br /> tempt in the 2010 zoning code update to accommodate variances that had already <br /> been experienced to-date. Mayor Roe spoke in support of providing a good bal- <br /> ance for the code to be flexible specifically with proposals for zoning changes and <br /> denial of the recent request on County Road B and how that code was interpreted. <br /> If there were ambiguities, Mayor Roe noted the need to address them; and en- <br /> couraged staff to bring text amendments forward that addressed those specific <br /> cases. Mayor Roe opined that residential PUD's may be a test case to use versus <br /> city-wide over all districts. <br /> Mr. Bilotta responded to Councilmember Willmus' LDR-2 concerns, noting that <br /> staff level discussions included ways to ensure the City Council was not placed in <br /> a similar situation in the future, whether LDR-2 worked or not, with indications <br /> that leaned toward a code change versus use of a PUD. <br /> Consensus of the City Council was to request staff to make their recommendation <br /> as to where and when a PUD made the most sense, and whether to limit to resi- <br /> dential districts or not. <br /> Mayor Roe sought consensus from the body as to their preference for review of a <br /> sketch plan and/or site plan review in other than PUD cases. <br /> Councilmember McGehee spoke in support, opining that it saved a lot of time, <br /> and if listed on a City Council agenda, served to alert the public that the issue was <br /> being heard and allow them to have a first view before the developer invested too <br /> much time and money in their project. <br /> From his development perspective, Councilmember Willmus opined that such a <br /> review may prove to be a useful tool, providing the developer with feedback be- <br /> fore becoming too entrenched in the application process. <br /> Mayor Roe stated that he had no objection to having staff look at making a rec- <br /> ommendation for site review process; and by consensus, the body concurred. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte commended staff for the good job in all their presenta- <br /> tions items tonight; opining that they were very clearly stated and opened up good <br /> discussion and providing clear direction in response. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked Ms. Peterson for her preparation of the RCA, opining that it <br /> was very well-written and well-researched. Mayor Roe wished Ms. Peterson well <br /> in her remaining work with the City and future endeavors. <br /> 15. City Manager Future Agenda Review <br /> City Manager Trudgeon reviewed upcoming agenda items. <br />