My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0707
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0707
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2014 8:41:51 AM
Creation date
7/16/2014 9:09:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/7/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 7, 2014 <br /> Page 9 <br /> City Manager Trudgeon clarified that the agreement (Attachment A) was outlined <br /> in broad terms, with the plat and Development Agreement scheduled for City <br /> Council approval at their July 21, 2014 regular business meeting. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that, while the City had yet to agree to sell the property to <br /> GMHC, this agreement allowed them to begin marketing the parcels. <br /> Housing& Redevelopment Authority Executive Director Jeanne Kelsey <br /> Ms. Kelsey advised that negotiations were still in process at this point for a final <br /> Development Agreement, with the City Council having identified Tax Increment <br /> Financing Districts 10 and 12 as a resource to write down the cost of the land. <br /> Ms. Kelsey clarified that this was not, nor were there any other agreements, to <br /> provide any other subsidy for this project; and that the purpose of this agreement <br /> was at the request of the GMHC to start marketing properties for pre-sales to <br /> begin addressing financial flow for the project. <br /> Councilmember Laliberte expressed her understanding of the process and current <br /> status; however, she noted the direction of a previous City Council, and subse- <br /> quently this City Council, to make sure the City is made whole on that piece of <br /> property, and as a member of this body, she could not pretend that direction was <br /> not in place. <br /> Based on her understanding, Councilmember McGehee opined that this provided <br /> an opportunity for GMHC to access the property and sell their concept or plan to <br /> float the development, excluding any construction or site work. Under those cir- <br /> cumstances, Councilmember McGehee opined that she didn't feel concern about <br /> them doing preliminary marketing or determining market interest, since it was on- <br /> ly two weeks before the Development Agreement would come before the City <br /> Council. Councilmember McGehee expressed her considerable faith in the HRA <br /> that they wouldn't have brought this agreement before the City Council without <br /> those assurances being in place. <br /> McGehee moved, Etten seconded, authorizing the City to enter into a Right of En- <br /> try Agreement (Attachment A) with the Greater Metropolitan Housing Corpora- <br /> tion (GMHC); for the purpose of marketing the homes to be constructed on the <br /> site prior to taking ownership of the property. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed his full understanding of Councilmember <br /> Laliberte's perspective and the validity of those concerns. However, Coun- <br /> cilmember Willmus opined that he was considering this as a simple erection of <br /> signage about the future development, not as a groundbreaking. <br /> Ms. Kelsey confirmed Councilmember Willmus' perspective, noting that the <br /> agreement provided placement of signs by the Realtor indicating contact infor- <br /> mation for any interested parties. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.