pf_02726 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CITY OF ROSEVITJ,E PLANNING REPORT DATE: 02-08-95 CASE NO.: 2726 Planner Approval: Department Approval: Agenda Section: 6(a) Item Description: Independent School District #623 request for .congeQt apJ)[pv-.algf a l'lanned urutdeveloPJuent consistin~f 60 townhoqles Igld 19 single family I \j)J lots, a rezoniUll trom R-l to r~sWentiai Phmnen iTnit ne,<~iopqJent (PlJD), , "JAJ S~~~ ~!!1d prelimina1;y and final plat approval on land generally bounded by Dide (L .dt)'P'-V-. ._~J. - ~ on the west and S. Owasso Blvd. to the north and Western Avenue tQ the VVV"Q 0 )w ~'-.. iiiA:" Vt> . /}east. Independent School District #623 also requests a change in the .~' _uJ-':3,J1t. Comprehensive Plan map relocation of the medium density residential uses tJ"1) ?. ~ Yi~ ~ ,and public park uses. ~}""~ J/~ 1. Bacl\groqn(i For some time now, Independent School District #623 has been working with the City of Roseville, the surrounding neighborhood and the community at large in the planning for development of the 77.5 acres the district owns in the southeast quadrant of Dale Street and Owasso Boulevard South. The land was originaHy purchased by the School District as a site for a third high school. With changes in the community and more efficient use of school facilities, the need for an additional high school on this site was eliminated making this surplus land for the district. As a part of a recent school bond referendum, the sale of this property was proposed as a method to fund other school improvement projects, . During the initial planning for this property, the City was interested in a coordinated development scheme that would include adjacent vacant parcels. This study area included 95 +/~ acres. After the initial planning stage, the concept plan that was presented to the neighborhood and community, inc1uded approximately 95 townhomes and )) 1 single . family lots. That plan was presented at numerous meetings with City officials, the surrounding neighborhoods, and the City. Since that time, the school district has been working on the best strategy for the actual development ofthe property. As was indicated ~.L ...1..-. _1.._.L_L _1__ ___....:.............:_ T__......._.. 4.L.^ "':II'I4-_~.....4- ...._<D. ..I_"",:..IA..I 4-_ _.A. _.. .i....._ ..I.............__A__~ iU ~Uti :S1\.tiL~U PULU 1tiV1CW 1U JiL-lU.u:u)', UU:: UliJUI"," UA" U't;\,.IU't;U '"V A...." Ai3 "II~ U't;y't;IVp~1 VI their property, delivering prepared single family and townhouse lots to a selected group of builders. John Shardlow represents the developer. The adjacent property to the north is proposed to be developed in a coordinated manner with the school district design but by a separate developer with a separate application. This devejopment proposes 38 townhome units and 2 single family lots. When added to the School District proposal, the area includes 81 single family lots and 98 townhome units. ~ 1