Laserfiche WebLink
<br />SCHDELL & MADSON, INC. <br />ENGINEERS + SURVEYORS + PLANNERS. SOrL TE~rING + ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES <br />10580 W A nATA BLVD, SUITE 1, MINNETONKA, MN 55305 (612) ~ 546 ~7601 <br />Wetland Data Forrn Wetland Basin No. 5 Stake 5 <br />Routine Onsite D~termination Method 1 <br /> <br />laid Investigator(s) Marshal Braman Date July 27 19~ <br />_ oject Site RoseviJIe State Mn. County~~ <br />Applicant /Owner Plant Community# {Name PEMB <br /> <br />t nermal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? !J Yes D No <br /> <br />as the vegetation, Soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? DYes ~ No <br /> <br />Vegetation <br />I Indicator <br />eminant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species <br />1, Ulmus americana % Facw- Tree 11. Rhamnus cathartica <br />I Salix SDP. % Facw- Tree 12, Corn us stolonifera <br />Fraxinus pennsylvanica % Facw Tree 13. Lemna minor <br />4. Prunus virginiana % Fac- Tree 14. Scrirpus valid us <br />I Acer negundo 50 % Facw- Tree 15. Tvpha latifaJia <br />r~ger ~ac~h~ri~~m % Facw Tree 16. SolidaQo SPD. <br />7: HOpuJUS aeltolces % Fac+ Tree 17. Carex spp. <br />. Populus tremuloides % Fac Tree 18. Phalaris arundinacea <br />Quercus rubra % Facu Tree 19. Sambucus pubens <br />Up side Zanthoxvlum americanum % Up! Shrub 20. Scirpus cvperinus <br />Percent of dominant species that are OBl, FACW, and/or FAC >50 % <br /> <br />I the hydrophytic veg~tation criteria met? .!JYes 0 No <br />aUonale <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />i <br /> <br /> <br />90 % <br />% <br />10% <br /> <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br /> <br />Indicator <br />Status Stratun <br />Facu Shrub <br />Facw Shrub <br />ObI forb <br />Obi forb <br />Obi forb <br />Facu* forb <br />'"' '- I ~-~I-. <br />VUI IU..... <br />Facw forb <br />Facw Shrub <br />Obi <br /> <br />nJ <br />-/0 <br /> <br />tries/phase Disturbed <br />s the soil on the hydric soils list? <br /> <br />I the soil a Histosol? 0 Yes <br /> <br />the soil Mottled? 0 Yes <br />Matrix color <br />Ither hydric soU indicators <br />the hydric soU criterion met? <br />Rationale <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Soils <br /> <br />subgroup2 <br /> <br />1.>> Ves . 0 No 0 Undetermined <br />~ No Histic epipedon present <br />~ No Gleyed? LJ Yes ill No <br />Mottle colors <br /> <br />o Yes <br /> <br />~ No <br /> <br />~Yes <br /> <br />ONo <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Hydrology <br />Surface water depth <br /> <br />I the ground surface inundated? 0 Yes <br /> <br />'tI the soil saturated? ~ Yes 0 No <br />lepth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole <br />st other field evidence of surface inundation or soil saturation <br />s the wetland hydrology criterion met? ~Yes 0 No <br />_ationale <br /> <br />I Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale <br />the wetland hydrology criterion met? ~ Yes 0 No <br />rliOnale far jurisdiotional decision <br /> <br />ia da/a form can be Ulled fer ths hydric 1100 assessment procedure and the plant comm~nity aasessmant procedure <br />lassincatlon according to "Sail TaKonomy" <br />