Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br /> <br />BCHOELL & MADSON! INC. <br /> <br />ENGINEERS.. SURVEYORS.. PLANNERS.. SOIL TESfING .. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES <br />10580 W A YZA T A BLVD. SUITE 1, MINNETONKA, MN 55305 (612) H 546 -7601 <br /> <br />Wetland Data Form Wetland Basin No. 5 Stake~ <br /> <br />Routine Onsite Determination Method 1 <br /> <br />IField Jnvestigator{s) Marshal Braman Date July 27 1994 <br />Project Site Roseville State Mn County, Ramsev <br />Applicant /Owner Plant Communlty# I Name PEMB <br /> <br />IDO normal environmental conditions exist at the plant community? IJ Yes 0 No <br /> <br />Has the vegetation, Soils, and/or hydrology been significantly disturbed? 0 Yes ~ No <br /> <br />Vegetation <br /> <br />I Indicator <br />Dominant Plant Species Status Stratum Dominant Plant Species <br />1. Ulmus amer!cana % Facw- Tree 11. Rhamnus cathartica <br />12. Sallx spp, % Facw- Tree 12. Camus stolonifera <br />3. Fraxinus pennsylvanica % Facw Tree 13. Lemna minor <br />4. prunus virginlana % Fac- Tree 14. Scrirpus valid us <br />15. ~cer negundo 50 % Facw- Tree 15. Tvpha latifolia <br />6, Acer saccharinum % Facw Tree 16. Solidaqo spp. <br />7: Populus deltoides % Fac+ Tree 17. Carex gpP. <br />8: Populus tremuloides % Fae Tree 18. Phalarls arundinacea <br />19, Quercus rubra % Facu Tree 19. Sambucus pubens <br />10 Up side Zanthoxvlum amerieanum % Upl Shrub 20. Scirpus cyperinus <br />Percent of dominant species that are OBL, FACW, and/or FAC >50 % <br /> <br />lis the hydrophytic vegetation criteria met? jJYes 0 No <br />Rationale <br /> <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />% <br />90 % <br />% <br />% <br /> <br />Indicator <br />Status <br />Facu <br />Facw <br />Obi <br />Obi <br />Obi <br />Faeu'" <br />Obi <br />Facw <br />Facw <br />Obi <br /> <br />Stratum <br />Shrub <br />Shrub <br />forb <br />forb <br />forb <br />forb <br />forb <br />forb <br />Shrub <br /> <br />teries/Phase Loam <br />Is the soH on the hydric soils list? <br /> <br />Is the soil a Histosol? 0 Yes <br /> <br />s the soH MottJed? 0 Yes <br />Matrix color 10 YR 2/2 <br />w:>ther hydric soil indicators <br />.s the hydric soil criterion met? <br />Rationale <br /> <br />I :~ <br /> <br />Soils <br /> <br />~ Yes. 0 No 0 Undetermined <br />~ No Histie epipedon present <br />~ No Gteyed? DYes IJJ No <br />Mottle colors <br /> <br />subgroup2 <br /> <br />IE No <br /> <br />a Yes <br /> <br />~Yes <br /> <br />ONo <br /> <br />no <br /> <br />Hydrology <br />Surface water depth <br /> <br />Is the ground surface inundated? 0 Yes <br /> <br />.~s the soil saturated? !JYes 0 No <br />Depth to free standing water in pit or soil probe hole saturated at 18" <br />IJst other field evidence of surface inundation or soH saturation <br />~s the wetland hydrology criterion met? ~ Yes 0 No <br />i8tionSle Assumed <br /> <br />I Jurisdictional Determination and Rationale <br />s the wetland hydrology criterion met? r>>' Yes 0 No <br />Rationale for jurisdictional decision <br />here is Phalaris arundinacea in the u land areas, but soils don't uali . <br /> <br />I' Thl' dala form oao ba used for Ihe hydrio so,l assessment pl'Qcedura and the plaot oommunity aseessment pl'Qcedure <br />Clssslftcatloo aocordlng to "Soli Taxonomy" <br />