My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02726
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:06:56 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:38:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2726
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Status
APPROVED
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
285
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.,-,,- -_.._~. -,............ ..nt.v, I\V~vVIllf;;;;, IVllflflt:J::iULl::l <br /> <br />J <br />J <br />I <br />I <br />( <br />r <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />The estimated net cash received on investment earnings over the course of the three-year <br />development and sell-out period is estimated at $23,918. <br /> <br />Estimated Net Cash to District - Development Site <br /> <br />The estimated net cash from the development of the si~e using the tflrgeted assumptions would <br />be $4.725.168. <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF OPTIONS <br /> <br />Present Value Analysis <br /> <br />The first step in comparing the two options is to perform a present value analysis of the cash <br />received from each option to determine which one yields the best return to the District. <br /> <br />A present value analysis takes into account the time value of money. One dollar received today <br />is worth more than one dollar received in the future, This type of analysis provides for a direct <br />comparison of multiple options at one specific point in time.. This analysis accounts for the <br />different time frames for receiving each option's projected cash benefit. . <br /> <br />For the purposes of this analysis, the discount rate (interest rate) used was the U.S, Treasury <br />Note with a three-year duration. This period was selected because it corresponds with the <br />proposal development and selt-out schedule. <br /> <br />The target date for the analysis is September 1, 1994. The present value (as of September 1, <br />1994) of an up front sale is $2,757,524, The present value (as of September 1, 1994) of <br />developing the site and selling the lots is $4,190,898. (See Exhibit C.) This equates to a <br />present value difference of $1,433,374. <br /> <br />Risk Analysis <br /> <br />The second step in the comparison of options is to compare the risks associated with each of <br />the proposed options, <br /> <br />Up Front Sale - Associated Risks <br /> <br />With an up front sale the risks are reduced significantly, The major considerations for a land <br />sale transaction include the timing of the receipt of cash by the District, environmental liability, <br />problems with the title to each parcel, future control of the development concept, and the timing <br />of the process. <br /> <br />~ SPRINGSTED <br /> <br />, <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.