Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Brokke reviewed the specific charge from the Council. <br /> <br />Placement Alternatives <br /> <br />Criteria Considerations <br /> <br />Potential Impacts <br /> <br />Suggested Use of Revenues <br />Chair Willmus suggested tabling further discussion to the March meeting and asked Commissioners to think <br />over the discussion from tonight and recommended visiting the site to have a clear picture of what is being <br />proposed. <br /> <br /> 2010 PARK IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (PIP) <br />4. <br />Brokke briefed the Commission of the history of PIP. <br /> <br />Began in 1991 with separate dedicated funding for projects outside of the funding for day-to-day <br />operations <br /> <br />From 1991-2003 the funding level was $250,000 <br /> <br />PIP funds were reduced to $150,000 in 2004 <br /> <br />In recent years PIP has been funded at levels between $150,00 and $200,000 <br /> <br />2010 PIP Budget - $185,000, proposed projects include; <br /> <br />Evaluate Acorn and Howard Johnson tennis courts for safety and maintenance needs <br />o <br /> <br />Replace court lights at Rosebrook <br />o <br /> <br />System wide playground improvements, as needed. There are currently 26 play areas <br />o <br />(playgrounds) in the system <br /> <br />Safety surface, replacement of cargo nets and play area borders <br /> <br />Nature Center Improvements <br />o <br /> <br />Replace carpeting <br /> <br />Paint/stain interior <br /> <br />Central Park Victoria Ball Field Improvements <br />o <br /> <br />Skin and rebuild 2 fields at CP Victoria. Ball fields are in dangerous condition and <br />desperately need attention. <br />Commission discussion followed; Commissioners recommended the City Council reestablish PIP funding to <br />the $250,000 level provided until 2003.Commissioners also recommended Parks and Recreation staff show <br />the Council the projects and system needs that are needed and important to the overall maintenance of the <br />operation rather than just addressing whatever can be afforded with the funding provided, after all, PIP <br />addresses community maintenance, health and safety concerns. <br /> <br />Commission Recommendation: <br /> Willmus moved that staff forward the list of projects as presented with a <br />change that restores funding to $250,000 so that needed improvements can be accommodated. Pederson <br />made a friendly amendment that added specific dollar amounts to the value engineered items. <br /> <br />Discussion: Dave Holt inquired into knowing more about how the Council makes decisions on <br />services like PIP without information to support the funding request. The Council needs to see the <br />true costs of deferring maintenance items and the significance of safety implications that go along <br />with the delays. People take Parks and Recreation for granted and tend not to see the consequences <br />of not maintaining our resources. <br />Pederson seconds the motion. Motion passed 6-0, Brodt Lenz was not present at the time of the vote. <br /> <br /> PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE <br />5. <br />Brokke updated the Commission on the progress of the Master Plan Update and promoted upcoming <br />listening sessions and community meetings. <br /> <br /> REVIEW ANNUAL CALENDAR <br />6. <br />Commissioners agreed that it made sense to delay the rescheduling of the November meeting until new <br />Commissioners are named. <br /> <br />