2012-11-01_PR_Comm Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

55 Motion failed 3-6. Doneen, Ristow and Wall voted in favor of the motion. Azer, Diedrick, Etten, D. 56 Holt, M. Holt and Simbeck voted against the motion. 57 Motion by Diedrick, second by Simbeck, to recommend to the City Council an increase in the 58 Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication rate from 5% to 7% of the FMV. 59 60 Diedrick and others suggested the following reasons for proposing an increase from 5% to 7%:  61 Commission is fulfilling their responsibility to regularly review rates and look for ways to 62 reasonably raise revenues  63 Maintains a competitive rate with surrounding and like communities  64 Increased revenues will help alleviate some of the potential tax burden to citizens and spread 65 costs to other users of the Parks and Recreation System  66 The Commercial/Industrial Park Dedication rate has remained at 5% since the late 1980’s  67 The increased use of the Park and Recreation System that is created with new development  68 The quality and extent of the existing Capital Improvement Program (CIP) and the current 69 investment in the Parks and Recreation System with the need to replace/preserve/enhance 70 that investment  71 The existing land values  72 The Adopted Master Plan and authorized Implementation 73 With the increase to 7%, the Parks and Recreation Commission feel that this will better reflect the 74 average and bring Roseville more reasonably in line with neighboring and like communities. 75 76 Ristow continued to voice his opinion that now is not the time to increase Park Dedication fees. 77 78 Commission discussed the pros and cons of setting a specific flat per acre fee for the 79 Commercial/Industrial rate and decided the percentage of the Fair Market Value was most 80 appropriate. 81 82 Motion passed 6-3. Azer, Diedrick, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt and Simbeck voted in favor of the 83 motion. 84 Doneen, Ristow and Wall voted against the motion. 85 PARK & RECREATION RENEWAL PROGRAM 86 6. 87 Brokke updated Commission on Renewal Program status.  88 LHB has been approved by the City Council to serve as the Lead Consultant to provide 89 direction and support in the development of Concept Plan, Construction & Design Standards, 90 project scheduling and RFP process  91 Council has awarded the final Bond sale. 92 Brokke reviewed the Milestone Schedule for the coming 9-10 months that will direct the tasks for 93 LHB and initial project needs. Brokke also reviewed the portion of the bonding program that 94 provides for the needed consultants and industry experts to carry out the extensive system-wide 95 Renewal Program. 96 97 Anfang updated the Commission on Recreation needs and impacts as they relate to the Renewal 98 Program. Anfang pointed out that Recreation programs and events cannot be cancelled or postponed 99 during the Renewal Program. Recreation may use alternate locations for a year or temporarily. These 100 changes will be planned for ahead of time and communicated to the community. 101 102 Doneen updated the Commission on the work of the Pathways, Trails and Natural Resources 103 Subcommittee. The subcommittee is a combined group of Parks & Recreation Commissioners and