My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-03-04_PR Comm Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2008
>
2008-03-04_PR Comm Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/18/2014 11:48:18 AM
Creation date
7/18/2014 11:42:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SEVILLE., PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />MINUTES OF MEETING OF FEBRUARY 7, 2008 <br />SEVILLE CITE' RALL — 6:30PM <br />PRESENT: Brodt Lenz, Johnson, Kamrath, Kruzel, Pederson, Ristow, Stark, Willmus <br />ABSENT: Hiber and Kendall notified staff ahead of time that they were unable to attend <br />STAFF: Brokke, Anfang <br />No Public Comment <br />2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 3, 2008 MEETING <br />Commission Recommendation: Minutes for the January 3, 2008 meeting were approved unanimously. <br />3. TWIN LAKES — McG®UGki PROPOSAL <br />Staff presented the McGough Development Proposal for Twin Lakes. The proposal involves the <br />redevelopment of the 26 acre PIK terminal site. Plans include two, six story office buildings, a lab and 2 <br />parking structures (3 and 4 stories each). Current site plans were reviewed by Brokke. <br />The proposed development borders Langton Lake Park. Tonight's review and discussion is meant to address; <br />• Access to the park for neighbors and the public <br />• How are connections to the park best made <br />• How does this development fit/work with the park <br />• Consideration to whether the most appropriate park dedication for this project is land dedication or a <br />cash contribution <br />Following Brokke's presentation, Carol Erickson (35 year Roseville Resident and Langton Lake Park neighbor) <br />shared her comments with the Commission. Erickson described how much neighbors love Langton Lake Park and <br />how many have been involved with the park since 1973. Carol questioned the "lab" description for a portion of the <br />development and wondered if this might actually be a manufacturing or warehouse site as there is not a recognized <br />occupant for this site. Erickson asked the Commission to consider the land dedication on this project to extend the <br />buffer between the buildings and the park. Carol also asked the Commission to be aware of and consider storm <br />water, drainage and lake issues as they review and evaluate this proposal. <br />Commission discussion followed; <br />• Willmus reminded Commissioners that Twin Lakes Redevelopment has been going on for 25 years. <br />Willmus also voiced his concern over the lab/warehouse and its 20 foot set -back from the park. Willmus is <br />concerned by the amount of buffer between the development project and the park and would like to see an <br />increased buffer area considered. <br />• Following some discussion on increased traffic, Ristow questioned what the difference is between cars <br />passing through Roseville on freeways and highways and traffic that enter Roseville to access businesses. <br />Ristow also added that we cannot continue to let the land sit vacant. <br />Following a spirited discussion, the commission was in agreement that they are interested in collaborative design <br />efforts that make the project work with the existing park and take into consideration environmental concerns. <br />Commissioners see the buffer between development and park as well as access to the park as the significant issues <br />in this redevelopment proposal. <br />4. DEPARTMENT REVIEW <br />,fill Anfang briefed the Commission on recent department operations and upcoming and recently hosted <br />programs and events. <br />OVER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.