Laserfiche WebLink
fields (open space); potential for and cost of low- <br />maintenance turf; and in-kind monies and/or labor <br />maintenance normally provided by the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Roe, with consensus of remaining <br />Councilmembers, noted the need for more prioritization <br />of needs in the parks system by the Commission to <br />address the most urgent needs. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson emphasized that the department was losing <br />ground, and anticipated that the Park Improvement Fund <br />would need an annual $75,000 to maintain existing <br />facilities and equipment. Mr. Johnson recognized the <br />tough choices faced by Parks and Recreation Director <br />Lonnie Brokke; and \[re-\] <br /> <br />2) – Discuss Commissions’ Role <br /> <br />Imagine Roseville 2025 <br />Mr. Johnson commended the City Council on their <br />acceptance of the final report; <br />Imagine Roseville 2025 <br />and enthusiastically supported the merits of the process, <br />the report, and empowerment granted to citizens in <br />providing input into their community. Mr. Johnson noted <br />the challenge to implement that vision; and sought City <br />Council direction to the Commission in how they could <br />assist. <br /> <br />City Manager Bill Malinen noted the daunting task staff <br />had undertaken in developing the specific and <br />department-wide or department-specific program goals <br />provided to the City Council tonight in a later agenda <br />item. Mr. Malinen noted that regular feedback and input <br />from Advisory Commissions would be welcome, <br />following a review of the first draft by the City Council, <br />and anticipated Council directive to Commissions <br />following that review. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust opined her desire for advisory <br />commission involvement and input running a parallel <br />track along with staff and City Council review of the 42- <br /> <br />