Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14,2014 <br /> Page 28 <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Trudgeon reiterated upcoming budget discus- <br /> sions, including: <br /> • August 11, 2014: Public Hearing with staff continuing to prepare and provide <br /> information available for the public's response through normal channels, in- <br /> cluding the website; <br /> • August 25, 2014: City Council discussion in more depth on staff's recommen- <br /> dations and their responses, proposals and further direction; along with dis- <br /> cussion of the CIP Budget (originally scheduled for August 18th, but deferred <br /> to the 25th due to other agenda items and time constraints); <br /> • September 8, 2014: Further City Council discussion <br /> • September 15, 2014: Further City Council discussion; and adoption of the Pre- <br /> liminary Levy <br /> • October and November of 2014: Further City council discussion prior to <br /> adoption of the Final 2015 Levy and 2015 Budget. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her appreciation for this presentation; opin- <br /> ing that this was one of the nicest, most accessible presentations she'd been aware <br /> of, including alignment with community goals and aspirations. Councilmember <br /> McGehee expressed her appreciation to staff for their efforts in providing a sus- <br /> tainable and well-thought-out recommended budget. <br /> 13. Business Items (Action Items) <br /> a. Request by the Community Development Department for a Text Amendment <br /> to the Commercial and Mixed Use Districts Section of the Zoning Ordinance, <br /> Specifically Table 1005-1 regarding Residential, Civic and Institutional Uses <br /> City Planner Thomas Paschke briefly reviewed this request of text amendments <br /> recommended by staff, and as detailed in the RCA dated July 14, 2014. At the <br /> request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Paschke displayed Table 1005-1 and highlighted pro- <br /> posed amendments. <br /> Based on her personal review, Councilmember McGehee questioned why student <br /> housing was proposed as a permitted use in Community Business (CB) and Re- <br /> gional Business-1 (RB-1) and -2 (RB-2) Districts, but not post-secondary colleg- <br /> es. Councilmember McGehee opined that previous discussions were specific to <br /> office based colleges or secondary schools, but not actual campuses in those dis- <br /> tricts. <br /> Also, under the live-work units in RB-1 and RB-2 Districts, Councilmember <br /> McGehee opined that those would not be suitable for student housing. <br /> Mayor Roe clarified that those permitted uses were not changed from the current <br /> use table,but only added as permitted uses in the CB Districts. <br />