My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/22/2014 11:01:08 AM
Creation date
7/22/2014 10:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/14/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 14, 2014 <br /> Page 30 <br /> Mayor Roe advised that the City Council could take action on these proposed <br /> changes tonight, or table those changes for the broader discussion. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed further questions related to multi-family <br /> dwellings in upper stories of mixed-use buildings (pages 2 and 3 of the RCA) and <br /> rationale for them going from not permitted to permitted uses. Councilmember <br /> McGehee stated that she had a problem visualizing where RB-2 areas were locat- <br /> ed in the City, since CMU was previously defined with retail below and housing <br /> above, based on how the buildings were laid out and parking lot structure. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee suggested further discussion as part of the broader discus- <br /> sion on those aspects as well. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that it would be appropriate to have those discussions yet to- <br /> night. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that for most of the Table, she had no issues, <br /> other than housing, and whether individual or dorms in RB-2 and RB-2 Districts. <br /> Mayor Roe pointed out that CMU Districts did not specify housing above retail or <br /> office,but simply stated mixed uses, and then not necessarily stacked units. <br /> Mr. Paschke noted that the Comprehensive Plan directed more mixed use pro- <br /> jects, which were currently only supported in CMU Districts, while other corri- <br /> dors in CB, RB-1 or RB-2 may be much more better situated to support them and <br /> provide an allowance for mixed use, whether such a development would ever oc- <br /> cur or not in those districts. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the definitions in the Comprehensive Plan didn't preclude <br /> housing from NB, CB or RB Districts, with housing listed in all to his recollec- <br /> tion. <br /> Mr. Paschke opined that if found appropriate in CMU Districts, staff thought they <br /> were reasonable in RB Districts as well. <br /> In his effort to surmise Councilmember McGehee's concerns in RB Districts, <br /> Councilmember Willmus questioned whether multi-family housing on top of <br /> Rosedale—as an example—was a good idea. Councilmember Willmus expressed <br /> his interest in looking more closely at it as well. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that the point is that current uses get redeveloped, and while <br /> not necessarily Rosedale, could be other entities in RB Districts; with staffs ob- <br /> jective to allow mixed uses on those sites, and recognizing challenges adjacent to <br /> other uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.