My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014-06-24_PWETC_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
2014-06-24_PWETC_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2014 2:51:55 PM
Creation date
7/23/2014 2:51:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Public Works Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/24/2014
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Pavement Lamination Issues <br /> At the request of Member Seigler, Mr. Culver reviewed what this meant, and <br /> suggested a review by the PWETC should be wrapped into their PMP study as <br /> well. <br /> Members were directed to some problem roadways for their inspection and at <br /> varying levels of deterioration: Rosewood west of Cleveland; Minnesota <br /> Avenue between Rice and Lovell north of Highway 36; and west of County <br /> Road C. <br /> • Community Solar Gardens. <br /> The consensus of the PWETC was that the City Council's initial charge was <br /> for a review of the City's current ordinances and how solar installations would <br /> be accommodated and/or prohibited and revisions to address that. Also, <br /> commissioners recognized that this review would be part of the grant <br /> application, if awarded, for that detailed review; with the initial step taken by <br /> staff to draft a Letter of Support on behalf of the City Council to submit for <br /> the City of Roseville to become part of the State's forty cities designated as a <br /> "Solar Ready City" in Minnesota. Mr. Schwartz opined that there would be a <br /> role for the PWETC in that review process. <br /> Other potential work plan items and areas of interest expressed by the City <br /> Council and/or PWETC members included: <br /> o Organic collection and how/if the City should be proactive; research of <br /> information on State Statute and Ramsey County mandates to understand <br /> how the City will implement it I the future; and requirements of cities <br /> receiving SCORE funding for curbside recycling to comply with the <br /> Ramsey County plan in the future. Commissioners noted that discussions <br /> and research of the Eureka Recycling, 3-year contract was needed as that <br /> was part of their proposal to provide organic collection opportunities in <br /> the third year of the contract; and/or to have it in place before new contract <br /> bids in 2016. <br /> Mr. Culver noted the strong interest and clear desire of Eureka to be a <br /> willing partner and move forward with organic collection, which is more <br /> easily facilitated with single sort recycling, with their current trucks <br /> having space available for organics, making their conversion easy. <br /> o Pathway Master Plan <br /> Member Gjerdingen expressed interest in pursuing ranking beyond the <br /> 2008 ranking, and shorter versus longer segments and funds required, and <br /> how to build in funding mechanisms to build out the pathway system <br /> following conclusion of the Parks Renewal Program. <br /> Page 7 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.