Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />Since the meeting, the discussions have centered around two issues: <br /> <br />1) Legal counsel has indicated that a dialogue between Mr. Oren and Mrs. <br />Cedarholm about Mrs. Cedarholm purchasing Mr. Oren's property has been <br />initiated. <br /> <br />2) The issue of whether or not an easement exists across Mr. Oren's property to <br />protect the Cedarholm sewer and water service has been raised. The <br />attached letter from Mitch Converse discusses this issue but cannot establish <br />rights to either party without further information. <br /> <br />As we understand it, the neighborhood and their legal representatives will continue <br />to work on this matter over the weekend, and will hopefully have a proposal to <br />present to the City Council Monday evening. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendations: <br /> <br />Mr. Oren's case is unusual in that his original proposal to add on to an existing but <br />deteriorated structure was permitted under the ordinance. To demolish that structure to <br />improve the property, however, amounts to giving up the "grandfathered" status of the <br />legal non-conforming use and triggers the enforcement of current setback standards, The <br />lot, while substandard in size and width, is a buildable lot and staff recommends approval <br />of a variance to the lot size and width requirements of the Shoreland Management <br />Ordinance. Because it is a buildable lot within the setback standards established for the <br />Shoreland Management Overlay Districts, it is difficult to find a hardship in the strict <br />interpretation of the statutory requirements for hardship. Therefore, although staff regrets <br />that Mr, Oren relied on information provided by the City, it is our opinion that design <br />alternatives exist that would allow the construction of a single family house on this lot <br />without the need for a variance to setback requirements. <br /> <br />Council Action Requested: <br /> <br />1. Motion to approve a variance to the lot size and width requirements of the Shoreline <br />Management Ordinance at 367 S, Owasso Boulevard. , <br /> <br />2. Motion to deny the request for a variance to the Shoreline Setback requirement of75 feet <br />at 367 S. Owasso Boulevard. <br /> <br />2. Motion to approve sideyard setback variances of up to 4 feet on the north and up to 2 <br />feet on the south at 367 S. Owasso Boulevard to allow Mr. Oren the flexibility to build his <br />house design at the 75 foot setback line. <br /> <br />Staff Report by: Mike Falk <br /> <br />3 <br />