My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02796
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2700
>
pf_02796
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:10:47 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 12:41:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2796
Planning Files - Type
Setback Permit
Address
1805 ROSELAWN AVE
Applicant
BLOMGREN, S. HUGO & MARIE
Status
APPROVED
PIN
162923130074
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />20 September, 1995 <br /> <br />'.; <br /> <br />Attachment for 10. D. <br /> <br />We request that our garage and driveway remain as is - 8 inches <br />from our east property line because of: <br /> <br />Almost 41 years ago, in 1954, when we bought this property from <br />Angeline Seidenkranz, we had the deed examined by our lawyer <br />before signing any papers. He found ~hat the garage was 4 feet <br />over the property line to the east. When we went to sign the <br />final papers at Twin City Federal, we informed them of this <br />problem and our lawyers recommendation to move the entire 80 <br />foot lot 8 feet to the east to allow a 4 foot clearance from the <br />garage to the property line. Twin City Federal's representative <br />and Mrs. Seidenkranz's lawyer agreed to this but the change was <br />written in at only 4 feet. So, for these 41 years we have been <br />under the assumption that we had the 4 foot clearance and put in <br />our driveway accordingly. <br /> <br />The recent survey in preparation for selling the property to <br />the east of us showed that the change was only 4 feet and the <br />original change was marked from 338 feet to 342 feet instead of <br />346 feet as agreed for our east property line. <br /> <br />As we have maintained the property for these 41 years believing <br />that we had the extra 4 feet, we.xespectfully request that we <br />be granted this minor variance so we don't have to relocate <br />our garage and driveway until such time as the garage is destroyed <br />or has to be rebuilt. <br /> <br />As we are retired and on fixed income, we would be unable to <br />move the garage to comply with the code. We could not afford <br />to do so but would have to sell and move. This we hope does <br />not have to be. <br /> <br />S. Hugo Blomgren <br /> <br />. .-'. / ~I'" ldin1'fLC4--- <br /> <br />Marie B. Blomgren <br /> <br />/lJct/2' U, f3{ IJ1mH-r/U ~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.