My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02803
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02803
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:11:03 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:18:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2803
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
ST. MARIE SHEET METAL, INC.
Status
APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />existing streets, and creating private streets or joint driveways and parking areas to handle <br />internal traffic flows. (This may be an eligible cost if such a development occurs and <br />requests the use of TIF.) <br /> <br />3) The cUlTent office building property owners do not support (and, at this time, do not find the <br />need for) the establishment of parking ramps on Prior Avenue as was proposed at one of the <br />study meetings. <br /> <br />4) Concern over James Addition residential parcels. Further study will be done on the James <br />Addition residential parcels when neighbors/property owners request such a study. <br /> <br />5) Page IND-8, Paragraph 2, sentence 2 will be rewritten to read "new subdivisions may be ' <br />required to dedicate land for parks ...". <br /> <br />BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Roseville City Council hereby approves and adopts the 1996 <br />Tower Place Area amendments to the City of Roseville Comprehensive Guide Plan, subject to <br />review and comments of the plan by the Metropolitan Council, <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City and businesses within the Tower Place Study <br />Area will continue to review and collaborate on new projects and trends, and <br /> <br />BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager and/or Community Development <br />Director are hereby directed to submit the Plan to the Metropolitan Cowlcil for review and comment. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was seconded by Member Wiski and <br />upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof; Mastel, Maschka, Goedeke, <br />Wiski, Wall and the following voted against the same: None. <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />STATE OF MINNESOTA) <br />) SS <br />COUNTY OF RAMSEY ) <br /> <br />I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Manager of the City of Roseville, County of <br />Ramsey, State of Minnesota, do hereby cel1ify that I have carefully compared the attached and <br />foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 22nd day of <br />January, 1996, with the original thereof on file in my office. <br /> <br />WITNESS MY HAND officially as such Manager this 22nd day of January, 1996. <br /> <br />s~ <br /> <br />SEAL <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.