My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02805
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:11:07 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:18:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2805
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
ROSEBRIER GROUP
PIN
042923340007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />JHN-l~-l~~b l~;~~ <br /> <br />!:!ILL MHt'(LH~ <br /> <br />O!~ (~O ~~~ i.~! <br /> <br />William J. Hargis <br /> <br />, Parkwood Place <br />7650 Curren Blvd., SuIte 230 <br />Woodbury. MN 55125 <br />omce: (612) 139-1040 <br />Fax: (612) 738-0425 <br /> <br />J <br /> <br />January 18. 1996 <br /> <br />Michael Falk <br />City Planner <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN P5113 <br />. " <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Re: Ordinance Amendment <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Falk: <br /> <br />I just learned of the proposed ordinance concerning noise from snow removal, deliveries, and trash <'(, <br />removal activities. I CMn an office building in Roseville as we Was an interest in an apartment building <br />also in Roseville. I am also a proponent of commercial industrial development for the greater St. <br />Paul area. <br /> <br />I believe the proposed ordinance and the process that has been used to date sends a very negative <br />message to your busJness community as well as to businesses that may be considering Roseville. I <br />understand this Issue has not been discussed at all with your business community. That should be <br />the first step in any effort to deal with a real or perceived problem. I will accept that you are trying to <br />deal with a sincere issue. <br /> <br />Deliveries and snow removal areoftsn done in the hours your retaHcenters and office buildings are <br />closed to avoid major traffic issues. I understand now you waht to curtail that, in effect micro <br />managing the businesses. I believe there are less Invasive ways to deal with the issue. The issue <br />struck me as similar to the "f1ag"lssue your community received so much adverse publicity on_ <br /> <br />If the issue goes forth, the noise ordinance should also apply to city activitie~, particularly snow <br />removal should not occur at night either in residential areas. I think if you look at the issue from that <br />etendpoint, you, together with your bu~iness community and residents, could reach a better solutIon <br />than what is on the table. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Very truly yours, <br /> <br />lJ)~ <br /> <br />William J. Hargis <br /> <br />WJH:cj <br /> <br />TOTAL P.01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.