Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Rose Place Neighborhood Response to City of ROS8vllle <br />Planning Report Regarding Scott Wicklund Request for <br />Conditional Use Permit and Variance at MIDC <br /> <br />1. General Observations: <br /> <br />A The city document does not mention that many of the residences, including <br />those on the 3 contiguous properties, are perched on a hill about 10-12 feet above the <br />property line. They overlook into MIDC property. Therefore, in 1976, the City <br />mandated a 15' deep heavily vegetated area (evergreens) on the south boundary of <br />the industry property to provide neighborhood screening. This tree barrier is <br />essential to protect the houses from looking into the industrial backyards, and, due to <br />the elevation difference, is the only kind of screening which is effective. <br /> <br />B. Because of the hill, the City's recommendations (Resolution, Item 12) <br />regarding a 5 foot woven fence, do not solve the primary screening problem. <br /> <br />C. In April, 1995, the landowner, Duane Albrecht, installed an 8-foot chain link <br />fence at the 15 foot property line. To do so, he pruned the evergreens to an 8 foot <br />height, cleared out the deciduous brush and trees, thus making the U-Hauls and. . <br />stored materials much more visible, both from the residence windows and from the <br />back yards. Residences on the 3 contiguous properties sit well above the top of the 8- <br />foot fence, so even if it were woven with opaque materials, its placement at the 15 <br />foot mark, ( rather than the 40 foot mark), prevents it from providing effective <br />screening. <br /> <br />D. For several years, the neighborhood has been requesting that the trees <br />which have fallen due to wind or disease be replaced. It is our understanding that <br />these requests have been relayed to Mr. Albrecht with no response. We feel that Mr. <br />Albrecht has not been at all sensitive to the residential concerns or quality. For <br />example, there have been other instances in which the neighborhood has had to <br />appeal to the City to intervene and check uses which impact on the neighborhood <br />(snow piles which flood backyards, operation of heavy machinery in the middle of the <br />night, etc.) Thus, the neighborhood wants to see any possible variance which would <br />permanently attach to the property very explicit and comprehensive in its protection <br />and expansion of visual barriers. <br /> <br />E. The neighborhood has seen one problem after another develop along this <br />residential/industry interface. We are very concerned about the possible <br />deterioration of neighborhood property values in general. We see a need for an <br />immediate, comprehensive look at this whole strip. Over the last 15 years, <br />inconsistent enforcement has resulted in problems which have included: <br />dumping-all sorts of junk, <br />hazardous chemicals stored outdoors, <br />open storage, <br />deterioration of fences on industry property, <br />fires-including one where we were evacuated due to toxic fumes, <br />industrial vibrations strong enough to shake homes & waken residents, <br />use ofMIDC property for dumping of tons ofrefuse-Iaden snow - <br />1 <br />