My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02813
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02813
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:12:21 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:19:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2813
Planning Files - Type
Rezoning
Address
1912 LEXINGTON AVE N
Applicant
KATH, BRUCE
Status
WITHDRWN
PIN
012923310020
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />structure, the ponding area, and landscape area, will be surfaced with asphalt with <br />concrete curb and gutter surrounding and defining the parking lot. <br />b. The drainage system has been reviewed by the Engineering Department and a <br />number of questions need to be answered. These questions can be resolved <br />through the building permit process. <br />c. All parking and service areas are defined by curb and gutter and are at least 5 feet <br />from all property lines. <br />d. The pump islands are well in excess of 25 feet from a property line. <br />e. The driveways proposed on the site plan exceed the 50 foot setback from a street <br />intersection. (County permits will be necessary). <br />f. The sign package is subject to the sign code and the zoning code and reviewed as <br />part of a separate sign permit application. <br />g. The sale of other retail products will be conducted in compliance with the <br />requirements and conditions for sales in B-3 districts. <br /> <br />9. In addition to the design standards relating specifically to automobile service stations, <br />Chapter 1013.01 of the City Code lists six criteria to be reviewed when considering an <br />application for a conditional use permit. These criteria include: <br /> <br />a. The impact on traffic. <br />b. The impact on parks, streets, and other public utilities. <br />c. Compatibility of the site plan and internal traffic circulation, landscaping, and <br />structures with contiguous properties. <br />d. Impact of the use on the market values of contiguous properties. <br />e. Impact on the general health, safety, and welfare. <br />f. Compatibility with the City's Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />10. It is City staff's opinion that the proposal would not meet the criteria for issuing a <br />conditional use permit because the proposal would not be consistent with the City's <br />Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan indicates that the site should be developed <br />as a business use and for low density residential. The proposed service station store with a <br />car wash would a consistent land use in the business district but would not be compatible <br />with the low density residential designation on the eastern portion of the site. The car <br />wash may not meet noise standards adjacent to a residential area. <br /> <br />11. The Planning Commission, at the March 13, 1996 meeting, recommended that this <br />item be continued, with the applicant's approval, to the April 10, 1996 Planning <br />Commission meeting, in part to consider an additional request for a Comprehensive <br />Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />En2ineerin2 Considerations <br /> <br />1. The City has asked its traffic consultant, Short, Elliott, and Hendrickson to analyze this <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.