My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02821
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02821
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:13:15 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:19:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2821
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
LAKE OWASSO ORDINANCE AMEND
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Because in~tituLion or a ~peed limit would nece~.~itat.e a cbange in tbe Joint Puwen> Agreement witb <br />Shoreview, I think we should hold on to our legal right to the 300' buffer in the current ordinance <br />until we can get tbe agreementofSboreview and approval hy tbe 11NR oftbe speed limit T would <br />not agree to changing to 150' before another protection such as a speed limit was in place. <br /> <br />By cutting out and weighing portions of the DNR and Roseville maps of Lake Owasso, I was able <br />to determine the proportion of the lake which would be affected by a reduced speed limit I have <br />identified three potential boundaries for the limit, A (least restrictive), B, and C (most restrictive). <br />Although I identified A,B. and C roughly based on lake dimensions. they correspond <br />approximately to: <br /> <br /> <br />3/7/96 <br /> <br />to: City of Roseville. Dennis Welsch, city council members <br />from: Peggy Egli, 705 Heinel Circle <br />regarding: Lake Owasso dimensions relative to possible speed limit in SWend <br /> <br />I believe that a reduced speed limit in the SWend of Lake Owasso, in conjunction with a 150' <br />buffer zone as proposed by Shoreview: would be a satisfactory solution to: <br />_ maintain watcrquality and reduce boat-gencratcd turbidity in thc lake. <br />_ address residents' concerns about increased speedboat noise. <br />_ maintain aesthetic and wildlife habitat value of the SWend of the lake. <br />_ prevent the inslallaLion of a new slalom cuurse at the lake's narrowest point. <br /> <br />Roseville portion of Owasso <br />Roseville minus A <br />Roseville minus A + B <br />Ro~evi11e minu~ A+B+C <br /> <br />100% <br />74.1% <br />68.5% <br />61.2% <br /> <br /> <br />A <br />D <br />C <br /> <br />2924 W Owasso <br />2968 W Owasso <br />3016W Owasso <br /> <br />699 Heinel <br />641/639 IIeinel <br />585 Heinel <br /> <br />DNR omdal lake map of OWasso: <br />I cut out the entire lake minu8floating and emergent vegetation , since these regions are not <br />accessible to speedboats. Regions A,B, and C (potential speed limit zones) were removed to <br />determine the % of navigable lake remaining. <br /> <br />Entire lake minus floating and emergent vegetation <br />Shoreview <br />Roseville <br /> <br />100% <br />48.9% <br />51.1% <br /> <br />Roseville only minus A <br />Roseville only minus A + B <br />Roseville only minus A + B+C <br /> <br />89.1% <br />86.5% <br />83.1% <br /> <br />78.7% <br />73.7% <br />66.9% <br /> <br />Entire minus A <br />Entire minus A +B <br />Entire minusA+B+C <br /> <br />RosevlUe city map <br />I cut out the Roscville portion of the lake. minus the 150' proposed buffer. Regions A,B. and C <br />(potential speed limit zones) were removed to determine the % of navigable lake remaining. They <br />arc (to the best of my ability) the same as A,B,C above. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.