pf_02824 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

plan and no .}ongerneedvariances: 2) Staff also recommends that the Planning Commission advise the City Council to direct s~ .t()~W:4y.r((4ycti6Ilof(pa.rkitig~$etl>~q.k)fst,@:g~,4~finijp4ystrial~on.ing districts and prepare a draft ordinance amendment for Planning Commission and City Council consideration in August. Any reduction in setbacks could be conditioned on the provision of additional benning, screening, and landscaping. It is the Community Development staff s opinion that it is 1ipp~(:)pJjtite to consider such parking setback reductions because the .~iD" s<?U1'l'~nt~tal1~Q$'II!~y(p,~Qqtq~1~9, m~Yi2t,~~t~:i9y~rpJjcedlunderutilized inciustrial....land, and 4P::tJ.Qttel1~~t;,;tl1.ei'tYP~;o:t!cl~y~r9PJ;:tl~I1t.;;tl1.~';GiD'is,'.attempting to promote in itsindtistrialareas( The City is promoting a business park type development Tather than heavier industrial type development in a number of its industrial areas. It may be appropriate to have parking setbacks which are consistent with business zoning districts. The City has also adopted design standards since the industrial parking setback standards were adopted. This helps to reduce the impact of the reduced setback. Suggested ~la~DiDgCQmmission'Action: I. Moti()ntor((commei1d~t,~~IJI>;js'P.Qtn:((c;~ss,~:"i!!itlpS".<?~~,}:)eg~u,ls,e. of the revisions Rya:l1'C()riipames'nasmadet(jth.eit::plAA$'~hich,,~linunates'theneed for variances. 2)M()tioI1.to.recommendthat'CitY,C()UI1.cil<liI'~Pt{$taff\t6istti.dy"reduction of parking setback staiidaI'ds..in..iI1.austrialz()nitJ.gdistricts"ana~Ptep~~:'~!;~@',Qrdinaiiceamendment for }>lanningCommissioI1"AAdCity.'C6uncilconsider~tiqJ:J.!ill,August... Any reduction in , parkingset}:)ack. sho\lldbecoriditioned'(jnthe'pr6visi6n\"of.additiorial berming, screening, andlAAdscaping. ., Staff Report by: Rick Jopke 6 , i