pf_02843 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes July 10, 1996 conditions as per the staff, and adding the following: "U-Haul" parking shall mean commercial rental vehicle parking with vehicles weighing under 26,000 lbs. gross vehicle weight and 26 feet or less in box size, and add to # 13 that the 40 ft. buffer shall be bermed adjacent to the north property line, and add condition # 18 which shall state that the applicant shall comply with the sign ordinance regarding the "U-Haul" operation, and add #19, the applicant shall apply for a grading permit when constructing the 3 ft. or higher berm, and add #20, the site plan and buffer plan dated 3/13/96 and application materials shall be considered part of this permit, and add #21, violations of the terms of this permit shall be considered a violation of the City ofRoseville City Code which may result in fines or revocation of the permit. Discussion: Member Cunningham asked if in # 13 who would be responsible for maintenance of the 40 ft. strip. (Answer: The land owner.) Roll Call: Ayes: Nayes: Cunningham, Rhody, Wilke, Sandstrom, Harms, Wietecki None 6(e) Plllllninc File 2843: Bruce Kath request for a rezoning, conditional use permit, preliminary and final plat, and comprehensive plan amendment at 1219 Lexington Avenue to construct a gas station/convenience store/car wash. Chairman Keith Wietecki opened the public hearing and requested City Planner Michael Falk to provide a verbal summary of the written staffreport dated July 10, 1996. Mr. Falk explained that the proposal is the third attempt to design a gas station/convenience store/car wash for this site. The current plan is down-sized in that the building is reduced from 4,000 to 2,700 sq. ft. There are only 6 pumping stations, the site is smaller, and the canopy and lighting are reduced in size, and the car wash is also reduced in size. He noted that the gas station proposal does meet the city requirements, and that the entire proposal meets the conditional use permit requirements of the code. There is not a significant change in the traffic volume, but the circulation within the site is poor and does need improvement. Chairman Wietecki asked for an explanation of why two parcels were needed and why landscaping and ponding are being placed on the adjoining parcel. Traffic Consultant Glen Van Worner explained the traffic impact.on the site and noted that the impacts are less than previous proposals but the internal circulation and driveway problems do persist. 8