My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02843
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02843
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:15:38 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:21:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2843
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
1912 LEXINGTON AVE N
Applicant
KATH, BRUCE
Status
DENIED
PIN
092923130034
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Meeting Minutes <br />July 10, 1996 <br /> <br />Phil Fischer, 1899 North Oxford, asked for clarification regarding the size of the holding <br />ponds and whether it would hold enough water for both lots and the size of the fence and <br />type of fence. <br /> <br />Kris Thompson said she was opposed to the hours of operation, the traffic increases on <br />Lexington Avenue, the need for an additional car wash, and the degradation of Lexington <br />Avenue as a gateway to Roseville. <br /> <br />Carol Wagner, Autumn Street, stated she was opposed to the Kath project because of <br />poor traffic circulation and the location of additional gas stations in the area. She stated <br />that Lexington Avenue is congested already and that the Lexington and B intersection is <br />at gridlock. She is opposed to the use of the site because it would include the sale to <br />trucks, trailers and RVs and asked why people would abide by the proposed circulation <br />plan on the site. <br /> <br />Suzanne McGregor stated she was opposed to the project because of the lights, noise, <br />congestion and traffic. She expressed concern regarding the community issues. Should <br />the site be designated for a small neighborhood commercial business instead of a gas <br />station; should Lexington Avenue remain a parkway and gateway to the community. <br /> <br />Joseph Mass, apartment owner of 34 apartment units along the intersection of Roselawn <br />and Lexington Avenue stated he was opposed to the project because of the heavy <br />commercial use that this would create including additional lighting after 9 p.m. He <br />expressed concern with the traffic, lights, noise, and turning movements. He also <br />expressed concern with the volatility of the gas stored in a residential area and increases it <br />may require for home and apartment insurance. He stated there was no added benefit to <br />the surrounding property owners and property values in the area will be lowered. <br /> <br />Dick Houck, 1133 Roselawn, stated he supported the project and felt there was no traffic <br />concern and no decline in property value. <br /> <br />Al Schrieber, owner of the 22 apartment units south of the proposed project along <br />Lexington, stated he was concerned with the timing of the business; 5 a,m. in the morning <br />is too early to open the business and midnight is too late to stay open. <br /> <br />Pat Gorman, 1891 Aglen A venue, stated he supported the project as an improvement over <br />past projects, and was concerned that the old tanks be cleaned up and that the new project <br />would pay better taxes. <br /> <br />Joan Fischer, 1899 North Oxford, whose property is adjacent to the east line of the <br /> <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.