My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0813_Ethics Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Ethics Commission
>
Packets
>
2014_0813_Ethics Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 10:00:52 AM
Creation date
8/6/2014 10:00:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C. If the City Attorney or City Manager determines that the subject of the complaint <br />may have committed a crime, the City Attorney and City Manager shall refer the <br />matter to the appropriate criminal authority. <br />D. If the criminal proceeding ends with a sentencing, said sentencing shall be <br />considered to be the final disposition of the complaint. <br />E. If there has been no violation of a criminal law, the City Attorney or City <br />Manager, as the case may be, shall issue a report that documents the results of the <br />City Attorney’s or City Manager’s investigation(s). <br />1. The report shall be sent directly to the City Council if the complaint <br />involves an Ethics Commission member. The Council shall have the <br />authority to dismiss any Ethics Commission member found to have violated <br />the Ethics Code. <br />2. The report shall be sent to the Ethics Commission if the complaint involves <br />other Public Officials. The Ethics Commission shall have the authority to <br />convene and issue it’s own report and recommendation to the City Council. <br />Thereafter, the City Council shall take action as the Council deems <br />appropriate. <br />F. The standard for decisions regarding allegations of ethical violations covered by <br />Section 3 of this code shall be “clear and convincing evidence.” The term “clear <br />and convincing evidence” shall mean that burden of proof as defined by <br />Minnesota State law. <br />G. In processing complaints, the City Attorney, City Manager, Ethics Commission <br />and City Council shall process and maintain data in a manner consistent with <br />Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, the Minnesota Data Practices Act. <br />A complainant may withdraw a complaint, filed under this Code at any time, <br />H. <br />in writing with the City Manager or City Attorney. Unless the City Council <br />directs otherwise, City personnel need not take any further action in <br />accordance with the Code after such withdrawal. Once acceptance by the <br />City Council has been granted, the City Attorney or City Manager shall <br />provide notice to the complainant, the subject of the complaint if appropriate, <br />and the Ethics Commission that the withdrawal has been accepted. <br />Section 6. Disclosure of Financial Interests <br />Not later than ninety (90) days after the date of approval of this Code, each Public <br />Official of the City shall file as a public record, in the office of the City Manager, a <br />statement containing the following: <br />7 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.