<br />'--.~~. ,....-,~"~
<br />r-~ \ ~:,j I
<br />I ~~t:u : -, ~t
<br />\ ~i~i'if. ~~, ~41 S
<br />Wi'':' \ U, ') ---
<br />
<br />r'.,.,' (('),-,', ~
<br />V_' .', ,-)_
<br />lii:t <:~:S :,.-"' j~-.. .
<br />~~"'~ .
<br />
<br />I '-.~..':::':':___,__..,..J
<br />
<br />~; f.f~;~~ f~'~'
<br />
<br />EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF MEETING
<br />OF CITY COUNCIL
<br />CITY OF ROSEVILLE
<br />RAMSEY COUNTY, MINNESOTA
<br />
<br />,..J:.,? '1. ,
<br />
<br />17
<br />
<br />~,t.':': "
<br />
<br />,:~~, ',' -~<
<br />
<br />"V()
<br />
<br />Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City
<br />, of Roseville, County of Ramsey, Minnesota, was duly held in the City Hall at 2660 Civic
<br />, Center Drive, Roseville, Minnesota, on Monday, the 16th day of December, 1996, at 7:15
<br />t
<br />, p.m.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />,
<br />~
<br />
<br />The following members were present: Wiski, Goedeke, Mastel, Maschka, Wall and the
<br />following were absent: None.
<br />
<br />Member Maschka introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
<br />
<br />RESOUJ:TION NO. 9364
<br />A RESOLUTION VACATING THElNORTH HALf Of COUNTY ROAD C-2
<br />RIGHT-Of-WAY, LYING EAST Of LONG LAKE ROAD/PARTRIDGE ROAD AND
<br />WEST Of 135W
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, after two weeks published and posted notice, the City Council held a
<br />public hearing to determine whether or not a portion of said street in the City of Roseville
<br />should be vacated; and
<br />
<br />WHEREAS, it appears that by reason of changes in the use of the surrounding land,
<br />it would be beneficial to the public interest to vacate a portion of said street;
<br />
<br />NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the ICif of
<br />Roseville, Minnesota, hereby vacates the north half of County Road C-2 right-of-way, lying
<br />east of Long Lake Road/Partridge Road and west of 135W subject to the following
<br />condition:
<br />
<br />1. The South 20 feet of said vacation is retained as a drainage and utility easement.
<br />
<br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Goedeke
<br />and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Wiski, Goedeke,
<br />Mastel, Maschka, Wall and the following voted against same: None.
<br />
<br />Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
<br />
<br />_L _ r'.
<br />
<br />J"~ 29 ~ 21 Pr;! '91
<br />
<br />~
<br />R!=TURN TO \ ,."..' ,
<br />...... .-:::".# .. -'.
<br />
<br />/ G ...2..
<br />
<br />: j . ft A
<br />
<br />RCtO~C~:~~~y
<br />
<br />x
<br />
|