My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02862
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02862
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:17:09 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:22:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2862
Planning Files - Type
Vacation Right-of-Way
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
ROSE PLACE VACATION
Status
APPROVED
PIN
102923120014
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />1455 Rose Place <br />St. Paul, MN 55113 <br />Sept. 10, 1996 <br /> <br />Planning Commission <br />City of Roseville <br />2660 Civic Center Drive <br />Roseville, MN 55113 <br /> <br />To the Planning Commission: <br /> <br />Regarding the proposed vacation of the City's right of way along Rose Place from <br />Snelling Curve to the east cul-de-sac: <br /> <br />The property owners on the north side of the street, during street reconstruction, <br />basically had the City permanently "take" at least 20 feet of a 28 foot easement, and <br />put the reconstructed road on it, rather than move it to the City-owned property noted <br />in the official easement description. <br /> <br />This rerouting--from City-owned land onto the residents' easements--was done due to <br />two factors: <br />-the City had originally paved the wrong property in putting in the street; <br />-in 1996, the City decided it did not want to cut the existing trees and run the road <br />on the easement, as it felt it would be too close to the houses on the south part of the <br />street. <br /> <br />I have no strong objection to this decision from the standpoint of balancing the street's <br />location. However, I have a very strong objection to the decision being made not to <br />compensate the residents on the north side of the street for permanent loss of their <br />property. At the very least, it seems to me that the street assessments of those of us <br />who lost property should be rescinded. <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />(Vt~A.~ <br /> <br />Margaret A. Redmond <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.