My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02867
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:17:50 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2867
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/TWIN LAK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />IF HYMAN FREIGHTWAYS, INC. <br /> <br />STATEMENT OF HYMAN FREIGHTWAYS. INC. <br />TO THE ROSEVILLE CITY COUNCIL <br />October 28, 1996 <br /> <br />Subsequent to the October 14, 1996 City Council meeting regarding discussions on the Twin <br />Lakes Business Park Development Plan, I have met with Roseville staff members to further <br />ascertain the proposed impact to the Hyman Freightways property. <br /> <br />Please refer to my written statement to the Council on this subject which was presented at <br />the October 14th meeting (copy attached). That document outlines many of my concerns <br />which are yet to be resolved. <br /> <br />On Monday, October 28, 1996, I met with Karl Keel, Dennis Welsch, and Council Member <br />John Goedeke to further discuss the proposed roadway that would require a portion of our <br />property. At this meeting, Mr. Keel provided a preliminary drawing depicting the approximate <br />position and specifications of the roadway and the property which Roseville desires to <br />acquire. <br /> <br />I want to thank Karl, the staff and Council for their willingness to work with us in <br />accommodating the city's needs while recognizing our continuing business requirements. In <br />keeping with this spirit of cooperation, I do not object to the revised route for Twin Lakes <br />Parkway with the understanding that there are many issues still to be resolved as this project <br />proceeds. The following highlights significant issues yet to be resolved, but is not intended <br />to be all inclusive: <br /> <br />1) Safety issues involving the visibility of on-coming traffic on both Arthur Street and Twin <br />Lakes Parkway <br /> <br />2) The turning radius of tractor and trailer units exiting our safety inspection lanes onto <br />Twin Lakes Parkway and Arthur Street <br /> <br />3) Location of the pedestrian walkway on the south side of the roadway <br /> <br />4) Safe entrance and exit of our property by tractor and trailer equipment during peak <br />traffic periods when our units will block both lanes of traffic <br /> <br />5) Consideration for the safety and increased operating costs incurred by Hyman during <br />the construction of the new roadway. We must have 24 hours per day, six days a <br />week access to our safety check lanes and our terminal property <br /> <br />General Office · P.O. Box 64393 · Sf. Paul · Minnesota · 55164 · (612) 784.5030 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.