My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02867
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02867
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:17:50 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:22:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2867
Planning Files - Type
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN/TWIN LAK
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
320
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />established at levels to protect the most sensitive segments of the population and are not to be exceeded <br />more than once per year. <br /> <br />Table 1. State Ambient Air Quality Standards for CO <br /> <br />I-Hour <br />Averaging Period <br /> <br />State Standard I 30 <br /> <br />lMaximum concentration in parts per million (ppm). <br /> <br />8-Hour <br />Averaging Period <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />The potential air quality impacts of the project were identified by estimating future CO concentrations <br />at the three busiest, most congested intersections in the Twin Lakes study area (Figure 6): <br /> <br />. Snelling A venue at County Road C <br />. Cleveland A venue at County Road C <br />. Cleveland Avenue at the I-35W Ramps <br /> <br />These three intersections represent the worst-case conditions relative to forecast traffic volumes and <br />average vehicular delay. As a result of the projected traffic conditions, these locations are also likely <br />to experience the highest CO concentrations in the study area. <br /> <br />The air quality analysis of the proposed redevelopment was conducted using the U.S. EPA MOBILE5a <br />emissions model and the CAL3QHC line-source dispersion model. The modeling was based on the <br />following assumptions: <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The analysis was conducted for the Year 2011 to represent conditions one year after completion <br />of the proposed development. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Twenty point six (20.6) percent of the vehicles were assumed to operate in a cold-start mode and <br />twenty-seven point three (27.3) percent of the vehicles were assumed to operate in a hot-start <br />mode. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The composition of the vehicle fleet was derived from 1990 Twin Cities vehicle registration <br />data. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Peak one-hour CO concentrations were modeled using worst-case meteorological assumptions, <br />including a wind speed of 1.0 meters per second, class "D" atmospheric stability, an <br />atmospheric mixing height of 1 ,000 meters, and an ambient temperature of 1 0 Celsius. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />A total of 36 wind directions in 100 increments were analyzed to identify the maximum CO <br />concentration at each receptor site. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Eight-hour average CO concentrations were derived from the peak one-hour modeling results <br />using a persistence factor of 0.7. The persistence factor accounts for the lack of persistence of <br />the worst-case traffic and meteorological conditions for eight consecutive hours. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />The air quality analysis is based upon the Year 2011 roadway and traffic control assumptions <br />documented in the traffic analysis. <br /> <br />#24397 <br /> <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.