Laserfiche WebLink
<br />...., " 3 1997 <br /> <br /> <br />Minnesota Department of Natural Resources <br /> <br />500 Lafayette Road <br />51. Paul. Minnesota 55155-40 <br /> <br />April 1, 1997 <br /> <br />Drew Budelis <br />Natural Resource Specialist <br />BRW,lnc <br />700 Third St S <br />Mpls, MN 55415 <br /> <br />Re: Twin Lakes Re-development Area in the City of Roseville, T29N R23W Section 4, Ramsey <br />County <br /> <br />Dear Mr. Budelis: <br /> <br />The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or <br />animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile <br />radius of the above referenced project. Based on this review, there are no known occurrences of rare <br />species or natural features in the area searched. <br /> <br />The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage Program and the <br />Nongame Wildlife Program, units within the Section of Ecological Services, Department of Natural <br />Resources. It is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare, endangered, or otherwise <br />significant plant and animal species, plant communities, and other natural features, and is used in <br />fostering better understanding and protection of these rare features. <br /> <br />The information in the database is drawn from many parts of Minnesota, and is constantly <br />being updated, but it is not based on a comprehensive survey of the state. Therefore, there are <br />currently many significant natural features present in the state which are not represented by the <br />database. We are in the process of addressing this via the Minnesota County Biological Survey <br />(MCBS), a county-by-county inventory of rare natural features, which is now underway. Because <br />survey work has been completed for Ramsey County, our information about natural communities <br />judged to be significant by our program is quite good for that county. The MCBS survey work for rare <br />and endangered animals and plants is less comprehensive; it is therefore possible that occurrences of <br />these features exist in the project area for which we have no records. Because there has not been an <br />on-site survey of the biological resources of the project area, it is possible that ecologically significant <br />features exist for which we have no record. <br /> <br />Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for.your interest in minimizing impacts on <br />Minnesota's rare resources. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame <br />Research Program focuses only on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by <br />the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. An invoice for the work completed is enclosed. You <br />are being billed for map and computer search and staff scientist review. <br /> <br />DNR \nfonwa\ion'. 6\2-2%-6\57, \-~OO-766,6000 . TTY: 6\2,296,54~4. \,~OO-657,3929 <br /> <br />An E4ua\ Oppnrtunily Employer <br />\Vho Valul'''; Divcr"il) <br /> <br />ft Printed on Recydcd Paper Containing. a <br />'-.I Minimum of !(V; Po"I-('on..,ulllcr V.iasll' <br />