My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02869
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02869
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:17:51 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2869
Planning Files - Type
Zoning Text Amendment
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Notes from May 13, 1996 City Council Meeting <br /> <br />Goedeke - Should be more stringent regarding expansion of owning adjacent facilities. <br /> <br />Motion: WiskilGoedeke to move to a work session for future and more discussion. <br /> <br />Mayor - a rezoning requires 4/5 votes, CUP's difficult to turn down. <br /> <br />Wiski - a specific district has a "mapped district". How/what can a church or school be sold for. <br />Churches are not allowed in commercial districts; nor are schools; what is scale of buildings in <br />neighborhood. Need threshold for uses and impacts. <br /> <br />(Dennis) <br /> <br />(Dennis) <br /> <br />(Dennis) <br /> <br />(Dennis) <br /> <br />Goedeke - <br /> <br />Mayor - <br /> <br />Wiski - <br /> <br />Notes from May 20. 1996 City Council Work Session <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />Add churches/schools, City buildings to permitted uses in "B" and "I". <br />Tax and safety issues. <br /> <br />2. <br /> <br />Specific zone for churches, schools, City buildings. <br /> <br />reduces possible associated uses with buildings, i.e. religious <br />shelter/convents/day care for adults. <br />reduces possibility of improvements <br />increases difficulty to sell off property. <br />requires 4/5 vote <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />PUD for each new or expanding church or school. <br /> <br />similar to zoning but more control with site specific conditions. <br />requires rezoning 4/5 vote. <br />may be cumbersome for renovation projects. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Upgrade the design standards section with set of standards for <br />churches/schools/public buildings. <br /> <br />Concern about tearing down or owning property in residential property. <br /> <br />Owning the home is OK, changing the use of the house to religious use/parking <br />would require 6 criteria of CUP. <br /> <br />CUP is administrative (burden is on City). <br />Zoning is legislative (burden on church). <br />Zoning should be broad as "place of gathering". <br />Need to determine scale through design standards. <br />What happens when use changes to non-church. <br />What are large scale uses. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.