My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0811_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0811_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:02:20 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 4:18:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
previous vote, opining that there was no reason to stand in their way if the City Attorney and Planning <br />Department had determined that this method was the best way to achieve it through a text amendment. <br />Member Boguszewski stated that he was confident in their rationale and opinion; and spoke in support of <br />the request. <br />Member Keynan spoke in support of the request as well, and for the proposed route taken; opining that it <br />was good thinking and a good plan overall. <br />Chair Gisselquist echoed the comments of Member Boguszewski, expressing his support in defining <br />“student housing” as a use versus “dormitory” in the code language. Chair Gisselquist opined that he would <br />support this as it created an opportunity for the college in meeting their needs; and he had no issues with <br />the request. <br />MOTION <br />Member Keynan moved, seconded by Member Daire to recommend to the City Council APPROVAL <br />of the TEXT AMENDMENTS to Section 1001 Definitions, Table 1005-1, and Section 1011.12E <br />Property Performance Standards of the Zoning Ordinance; based on the comments and findings of <br />Sections 4-6 and the recommendation of Section 7 of the staff report dated May 7, 2014. <br />With concurrence by Mr. Paschke, Member Murphy spoke in support of the motion as stated; noting that <br />further consideration of revising boarding school language as discussed relative to Section 5.1 of the staff <br />report could be revised in the future following staff’s research. If appropriate, Mr. Paschke noted that further <br />language revisions, if consistent with tonight’s Planning Commission discussion, could be added to staff’s <br />recommendations before this request was heard by the City Council; and the chart changed accordingly <br />and if still appropriate, and at the discretion of the Commission. <br />By consensus, the Commission agreed to this process as described by Mr. Paschke, asking that the <br />Planning Commission be copied with the report resulting from that research and the revised <br />recommendations to the City Council. <br />Mr. Paschke duly noted that request. <br />Ayes: 5 <br />Nays: 0 <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.