My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0811_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0811_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:02:20 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 4:18:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
77 In his effort to surmise Councilmember McGehee?s concerns in RB Districts, <br />78 Councilmember Willmus questioned whether multi-family housing on top of <br />79 Rosedale - as an example - was a good idea. Councilmember Willmus expressed his <br />80 interest in looking more closely at it as well. <br />81 Mayor Roe opined that the point is that current uses get redeveloped, and while not <br />82 necessarily Rosedale, could be other entities in RB Districts; with staff's objective to <br />83 allow mixed uses on those sites, and recognizing challenges adjacent to other uses. <br />84 Councilmember McGehee stated that her question was, instead of making this so <br />85 broad and allowing whatever to come in anywhere, when a specific project came <br />86 forward, as done with the Dale Street Project, it can then be rezoned versus having <br />87 open season across the City without regulations in place. Councilmember McGehee <br />88 noted that this was a problem the City Council had found itself in from time to time in <br />89 the past, without a place to take a stand. <br />90 Mayor Roe sought Council consensus on whether to take action tonight; and from his <br />91 perspective opined that he had no problem with the proposed changes with one <br />92 exception to consider the first two residential uses under CB (multi-family) <br />93 recognizing that sometimes CB sites are strip malls and may make sense for <br />94 redevelopment for housing in the future. <br />95 Due to no time limit and unfinished discussion on many of these issues and the need <br />96 for a fuller discussion to address those items not yet settled, McGehee moved, <br />97 Willmus seconded, TABLING TO A DATE UNCERTAIN THE request by the <br />98 Community Development Department for a Text Amendment to the Commercial and <br />99 Mixed Use Districts Section of the Zoning Ordinance, Specifically Table 1005-1 <br />100 regarding Residential, Civic and Institutional Uses <br />Roll Call <br />101 <br />Ayes: <br />102 McGehee and Laliberte. <br />Nays: <br />103 Willmus; Etten; and Roe. <br />Motion failed. <br />104 <br />105 Willmus moved, Laliberte seconded, TABLING TO THE JULY 21 COUNCIL <br />106 MEETING the request by the Community Development Department for a Text <br />107 Amendment to the Commercial and Mixed Use Districts Section of the Zoning <br />108 Ordinance, Specifically Table 1005-1 regarding Residential, Civic and <br />109 Institutional Uses <br />Roll Call <br />110 <br />Ayes: <br />111 McGehee; Willmus: Laliberte; and Etten. <br />Nays: <br />112 Roe. <br />Motion carried. <br />113 <br />114 City Manager Trudgeon requested that the City Council clarify what they wanted staff to <br />115 bring back. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.