My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014_0811_CCpacket
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2014
>
2014_0811_CCpacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:02:20 PM
Creation date
8/7/2014 4:18:11 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
207
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LMCIT Sign Retroreflectivity Memo and Model Policy <br />, League of Minnesota Cities (Final <br />Edition, March 2014). <br />Article IV. Sign Inventory <br />To meet the city’s goal of maintaining sign retroreflectivity above certain levels, the City of <br />Roseville will maintain a sign inventory of all new or replacement signs installed after the <br />effective date of this policy. The inventory shall indicate the type of sign, the location of the sign, <br />the date of installation or replacement, the type of sheeting material used on the sign face, the <br />expected life of the sign, and any maintenance performed on the sign. <br />As to existing signs, the city will perform an inventory of all signs covered by this policy. The <br />city recognizes this process will occur over time subject to the city’s monetary and human <br />resources. The city completed its sign inventory in 2011. The city shall record the above <br />information related to new signs to the extent that such information is known and shall also <br />include a statement on the general condition of the sign. <br />Article V. Removal of Signs <br />In recognition of the fact that excess road signs have been shown to reduce the effectiveness of <br />signage, as well as impose an unnecessary financial burden on road authorities, it is the city’s <br />policy to remove signs determined to be unnecessary for safety purposes and which are not <br />required to comply with an applicable state or federal statute or regulation. The removal of signs <br />shall be based on an engineering study and the MN MUTCD. <br />Article VI. Approved Sign Evaluation Method. <br />After reviewing the various methods proposed for sign maintenance, the City adopts one or more <br />of the following methods to meet the minimum sign retroreflectivity requirements in the MN <br />MUTCD: <br />1) Expected Sign Life <br />The installation date is labeled or recorded when a sign is installed, so that the age of any given <br />sign is known. The age of the sign is compared to the expected sign life. The expected sign life is <br />based on the experience of sign retroreflectivity degradation in the City. Signs older than the <br />expected life will be replaced. <br />2) Blanket Replacement <br />All signs in the City of a given type are replaced at specified intervals. This eliminates the need to <br />assess retroreflectivity or track the life of individual signs. The replacement interval is based on <br />the expected sign life for the shortest-life material used in the City or a given sign type. The <br />current replacement interval is 20 years. <br />Article VII. Sign Replacement. <br />The City hereby establishes the following priority order in which road signs will be replaced: <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.