My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02878
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02878
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:18:03 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:23:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2878
Planning Files - Type
Planning-Other
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
HEARING PROCEDURE (CITY COU
Status
Non-Active
PIN
022923440056
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />8. The estimated number of trips generated by this development is estimated at nearly 8,000 <br />trips per day. At this time. the traffic study being performed by BRW has not been <br />completed. Once the traffic study is completed, staff should work with BRW and Ramsey <br />County to develop a set of recommendations. <br /> <br />9. Many of the local residents have expressed a concern regarding cut-through traffic along <br />Brenner Avenue and Evelyn Street. In the near future, the Engineering Department will <br />place traffic counters in the neighborhood to determine if there is currently a cut-through <br />problem. <br /> <br />10. For Lot 4. the site plan should be reexamined assuming no driveway access to Cleveland <br />Avenue. The current configuration suggests that trucks would enter via the proposed access <br />to Cleveland Avenue to enter the loading area. This in and of itself may be undesirable. since <br />the loading area faces Cleveland Avenue. <br /> <br />11. For all sites. the applicant should examine internal truck circulation. Many of the sites have <br />unique parking lot configurations which create difficult turning movements for larger <br />vehicles. <br /> <br />12. For Lot 8. compact parking stalls are shown along the west and northwest portions of the <br />parking lot. The spaces are located on the opposite side of the parking area ITom the <br />entrances which makes the spaces somewhat undesirable. It is likely that vehicles. including <br />compact cars. will park closer to the entrances, leaving the compact stalls for last. Larger <br />vehicles entering the site will be forced to park in the compact stalls in this instance. <br /> <br />The comments above generally apply to the proposal for the hotels! restaurants located on Lots 9 <br />through 12. If you have any questions regarding either of these planning files. please contact me <br />at 221. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.