Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Timothy 1. Nelson <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />December 3, 1996 <br /> <br />A3 stated in the preceding paragraph, the Twin Lakes Development Subdistrict <br />encompasses about 95 acres. The Part I and Part II development properties referenced in <br />the Development Agreement have a total size of 16.42 acres and are being developed to <br />include a total of260,000 square feet of office/warehouse/showroom space. Subtracting <br />the 16.42 acres from the total of9S acres results in 78.58 acres of property remaining to <br />be developed within the Twin Lakes Development Subdistrict. If that remaining property <br />is developed at the same floor area ratio as the Part I and Part IT development properties, <br />the potential additional development in the Twin Lakes Development Subdistrict is <br />1, 240,000 square feet of office/warehouse/showroom space. Summing this additional <br />development with the 260,000 square feet encompassed by the Part I and Part IT projects, <br />the total potential development in the Twin Lakes Development Subdistrict is 1.5 million <br />square feet of floor area. This 1.5 million square feet of space does not include the <br />projects that the Developer already has constructed in the Twin Lakes Business Park, <br />which consist of 122,072 square feet of office/warehouse/showroom and 69,403 square <br />feet of office space. Also, in conjunction with an earlier Agreement, the Developer is <br />committed to construct an additional 35,000 square feet of office space to expand upon <br />the previously referenced 69,403 square foot office development. <br /> <br />On page 8 of the "Guide to the Rules," eight criteria are presented that are utilized by <br />EQB staff to determine if potential future stages constitute phased actions. In correlating <br />these criteria with the Development Agree~ent, it is our determination that current <br />development in the Twin Lakes Business Park definitely consists of a series of phased <br />actions. Particularly significant items that have led us to this conclusion are: <br /> <br />- Close proximity of the development properties (criterion 1) <br /> <br />- Provision of development rights for future stages through the right of first offer <br />( criterion 2) <br /> <br />- Plans by the City to construct Twin Lakes Parkway through the Twin Lakes <br />Business Park area to serve future stages of development (criterion 4) <br /> <br />- Significance ofthe right of first offer to prejudice decisions about future stages <br />(criterion 5) <br /> <br />- History of the Developer in completing three other developments in the Twin <br />Lakes Business Park, in addition to the two development properties addressed <br />in the above referenced Development Agreement, and in addition to the right <br />of first offer on other development properties in the subject area (criterion 7) <br /> <br />In addition to the current development in the Twin Lakes Business Park constituting <br />phased actions, it also is our judgment that such development constitutes connected <br />actions according the "Guide to the Rules." Page 9 in the "Guide to the Rules" presents <br />three criteria that are applied in determining whether projects constitute "connected <br />actions." In our judgment the history of development and planning addressed in this letter, <br />together with provisions in the Development Agreement, clearly create a situation that <br />meets the first criterion, namely that develC'pment on one property in the Twin Lakes <br />Business Park will induce development on other properties in the business park. <br />