My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02882
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02882
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:19:54 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:24:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2882
Planning Files - Type
Conditional Use Permit
Address
2233 HAMLINE AVE N
Applicant
SPINT PCS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />APR-14-1997 14:18 <br /> <br />SCIENCE MUSEUM OF MN <br /> <br />612 221 4777 P.01/01 <br /> <br />Mr. Jeffrey J. Wraspir <br />1877 Alta Vista Dr. <br />Roseville MN 55113 <br />w: 221-2526 <br />h. 488-9576 <br />4/14/97 <br /> <br />City Planner <br />City of Roseville <br /> <br />Hello - <br /> <br />I will be unable to attend the City Council meeting tonight and wish to have this letter shared with <br />the council in regards to the conditional use petroit on the St Paul Water Utility Site. <br /> <br />After attending and teStifying at the Planning Commission hearing recently I wish to stale that I am <br />not opposed to the tower with the following condition. <br /> <br />1) Tower to be positioned on the west/southwest comer of properly (site). <br /> <br />The tower will have a significantly less visual impact in the neighborhood if positioned in this <br />location. I have a preference for the lattice design if that is less obtrusive. 1 also understand that <br />expansion to the tower will be easier and again less obtrusive with a lattice design. <br /> <br />I just wanted to share my thoughts on this maller and say that it has been a positive learning <br />experience for me to take part at both the City Council and Planning Commission public hearings. <br />I know that everyone on the Council has been Laking an aeti ve interest in this project I also know <br />the council is aware of many of the long tcnn ramifications this project will have both on the <br />neighborhood and the community at large. <br /> <br />To summarize, I am not opposed to the tower if it can be positioned in the southwest corner of the <br />property that was idenw1ed at the Planning Commission public hearing. To place the tower where <br />a house used to be on the site would cause more of an eyesore for the neighborhood. Originally I <br />understand this was to be the site for the tower. <br /> <br />Sincerely. <br /> <br /> <br />;-?~ <br />o/Iy/tj-1- <br /> <br />TOTAL P.01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.