My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pf_02885
Roseville
>
Planning Files
>
Old Numbering System (pre-2007)
>
PF2000 - PF2999
>
2800
>
pf_02885
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 12:20:30 PM
Creation date
12/8/2004 1:25:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Planning Files
Planning Files - Planning File #
2885
Planning Files - Type
Planned Unit Development
Address
2660 CIVIC CENTER DR
Applicant
SOUTHWIND OF ROSEVILLE
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />master plan and a detailed planting around each entry. (The City Code now requires a <br />registered landscape architect to complete these designs and specifications. The <br />developer has complied.) <br /> <br />4.8) Guest parking is not shown because this is a public street concept, similar to <br />Harstad's 1995 project. Room for such parking could be designed into the project near <br />the open space/surface water ponding area. Parking on the street needs further review <br />in this case. <br /> <br />M Staff Recommendations: <br /> <br />Staff recommends that this project meets the intent of the medium density designation <br />within the Comprehensive Plan and should be approved as a PUD zone, allowing <br />housing densities up to 10 units per acre. Design details of the twinhomes meet the <br />city code design standards and will be restated as part of the PUD process and <br />requirements placed in the PUD agreement. <br /> <br />Terms of purchase of city land will be worked out with the City and reviewed by the city <br />attorney. <br /> <br />Suggested Commission Action: <br /> <br />1) Open the public hearing. Accept comment. If satisfied all comment has been <br />heard, close the hearing, otherwise continue the hearing to the next regular meeting, <br />April 9, 1997, with the concurrence of the developer, to allow the staff more time to <br />resolve new issues brought forth at the hearing. <br /> <br />2) By motion, recommend approval of the preliminary plat and final plat, with <br />vacations of portions of the existing Zeece Plat as necessary, to conform with the new <br />phased site plan and PUD. <br /> <br />3) By motion, recommend approval of the attached conditions of a draft Planned <br />Unit Development (with any additions suggested by the Planning Commission). <br />Further, recommend that any changes in density of more than 1 unit per acre, and <br />significant site redesign shall be submitted to the Commission for review. <br /> <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.