Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> <br />Staff Interpretation of Sign Code: <br /> <br />It is the City staffs interpretation that the City Planner properly interpreted the <br />ordinance. and that the requirement was communicated to the sign company as noted <br />on the sign application. a copy of which was obtained from the sign company. The <br />ma~~~9~?~~g"g,~gl:9i~,L~~11"~~, . ~~"I.i)mg~f:~!m{;~.~.~i$(3r~!E311- '.wh icn was i the <br />." intenf^6fthis'partici.llar:'o"ro <br /> <br /> <br />$taff Recommendation: <br /> <br />1. City staff recommends that the current display be corrected to meet the <br />requirements of the code ~E.!~fiJ~~~~m'e,~$'ag'j:tA'e~:me~i'm~~or;~FolliI19'}, 'bhanging.no <br />mofe'~:trn'al'\'ql"\~E3j;P~~!ilg.~]i~!:).:~r~r~fi <br /> <br />2. City staff recommends that t~~CitY?OU~cil"i ~~.!h~~~~rdof Adjustment and <br />Appeals, im~1s lP:r.eta'iijl!i~aiJ\~fGiract;'sta!jto~fU rtherenfo rceme nt <br />'.'mea$l.1l'e~:a's <br /> <br />s.,.,~~, Action 'S~ii{;j <br /> <br /> <br />By motion, interpret the ordinance as requiring a "non moving or rolling message" that <br />may be changed no more than once in a 24 hour period and direct staff to take the <br />appropriate further enforcement actions. <br /> <br />J:\CHAR\WP51 CH\RCA\022497B.RCA <br /> <br />~~~t;~ . <br />'bvt . / <br />;J1J-- .~ <br />,}I-~"A' <br /> <br />Staff Report by: Rick Jopke (490-2241) <br /> <br />~~ tk~.,.d ~7 4A~ <br /><pc.. \00'" o~4 <br /> <br />2 <br />