My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2014_0721
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2014
>
CC_Minutes_2014_0721
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2014 3:24:45 PM
Creation date
8/12/2014 9:59:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/21/2014
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,July 21,2014 <br /> Page 22 <br /> • Twin Lakes Parkway Extension <br /> Mr. Culver noted that the Parkway was currently constructed to Prior Avenue; <br /> and reviewed further estimated extension costs, federal funding received for <br /> right-of-way acquisition. Mr. Culver anticipated the extension to Fairview <br /> Avenue as soon as 2015; and noted that the extension would include traffic <br /> controls at Fairview Avenue and Twin Lakes Parkway and Terrace Drive. <br /> • Traffic Signal at County Road C-2 and Cleveland Avenue <br /> Mr. Culver advised that this improvement was necessary for further redevel- <br /> opment including the existing Metro transit parking ramp; and anticipated <br /> costs of$500,000, which would provide significant benefit to existing uses on <br /> the west side of Cleveland Avenue. <br /> In order to assign benefit and cost allocation, Mr. Culver reviewed optional as- <br /> sessments under Minnesota State Statute Chapter 429 and the current City of Ro- <br /> seville Special Assessment Policy. <br /> Mr. Culver addressed calculations based on trips = benefit and how trip genera- <br /> tion was based on assumed highest and best use for a parcel as well as potential <br /> land use over an entire area at average trip rate calculations and average floor area <br /> (AFR) ratios used to determine the total number of trips for each parcel and their <br /> highest and best use. Mr. Culver reviewed calculations with the existing land use <br /> plan in defining parcels at 26% of parcel size for commercial/office use and 30% <br /> total parcel size for industrial use. Mr. Culver clarified that it remained unknown <br /> what the actual land use would end up on any individual parcel, but based on av- <br /> erage trip rate calculations, with the average FAR used to calculate the number of <br /> trips from each parcel and then distribute that across the area for pm peak hour <br /> trips. Mr. Culver provided a general example using a 3/7 acre parcel along Cleve- <br /> land Avenue. <br /> In accordance with City Policy, Mr. Culver reviewed the appraisal process for <br /> proving benefit and showing an increase in value of at least the proposed assess- <br /> ment; with any properties assigned a higher benefit only assessed for the ap- <br /> praised benefit amount. Mr. Culver noted that this could create gaps in actual <br /> versus calculated benefits, with that cost borne by the City and funding options <br /> (e.g. TIF funds) identified as appropriate. <br /> Mr. Culver identified benefit areas by map and reviewed how traffic was modeled <br /> throughout the areas and trip distribution using that model by tracking how many <br /> trips from each parcel went through each proposed improvement area, which de- <br /> termined the area of benefit and which parcels paid for each improvement. <br /> Regarding the next steps with direction by the City Council, Mr. Culver advised <br /> that staff intended to meet with property owners this fall, followed by a feasibility <br /> study; with eventual levying of assessments as individual improvements are com- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.