Laserfiche WebLink
4.0B <br />ACKGROUND <br />12 <br />4.1Since October 2012, the City Council and the Community Development Department have <br />13 <br />been engaged in a process to re-envision the Twin Lakes Area. Over the past 16 months <br />14 <br />the City Council has held numerous meetings with Staff to discuss their desires for the <br />15 <br />future of Twin Lakes. These discussions included the previous action that sought to align <br />16 <br />the Community Mixed-Use definition with the proposed text amendments to the Zoning <br />17 <br />Code. Specific to this request, the Community Development Department proposed <br />18 <br />several land use and zoning options for the City Council to consider and the Council <br />19 <br />decided to pursue one change. <br />20 <br />4.2The area located along the north side of Terrace Drive and across (west) Fairview <br />21 <br />Avenue, directly adjacent to the future Twin Lakes Parkway is currently guided High <br />22 <br />Density Residential and zoned High Density Residential-1 District (see attached map). <br />23 <br />The intent of the City in 2009 (when the Comprehensive Plan was adopted) was to create <br />24 <br />a distinct multifamily area to buffer the lower density residential and City park uses to <br />25 <br />the north from the adjacent light manufacturing/industrial, business, and retail uses that <br />26 <br />are prevalent in the area or may be developed there in the future. <br />27 <br />4.3The potential for a high concentration of multi-family density developments as well as <br />28 <br />the issues the Community Development Department is experiencing with current non- <br />29 <br />conforming uses suggests that the area not be designated High Density Residential. <br />30 <br />4.4To facilitate the City Council’s discussion of land use and zoning, the Planning Division <br />31 <br />looked at the highest and best use and prepared a mapping exercise to identify what sorts <br />32 <br />of uses were best suited for Twin Lakes. That information was then assembled into a <br />33 <br />number of new zoning districts (differing versions of Community Mixed-Use \[CMU\]) <br />34 <br />and brought forward to the Council for consideration. In the end, the City Council <br />35 <br />determined that the CMU District remains a great designation for Twin Lakes and that <br />36 <br />such a guiding and zoning should be placed on the subject properties. <br />37 <br />4.5An applicant seeking approval of a CLUP and/or <br />38 OMPREHENSIVE ANDSELAN MAP CHANGE <br /> is required to hold an open house meeting to inform the <br />39 ZONING MAP CHANGE <br />surrounding property owners and other interested individuals of the proposal, to answer <br />40 <br />questions, and to solicit feedback. The open house for this application was held on April <br />41 <br />24, 2014; the summary of the open house meeting provided by the City Planner is <br />42 <br />included with this staff report as Attachment C. <br />43 <br />5.0PA <br />ROPOSEDNALYSIS <br />44 <br />5.1CLUPMC: City Code §201.07 (Comprehensive <br />45 OMPREHENSIVE ANDSELANAPHANGE <br />Plan Amendments) allows property owners to seek, and the Planning Commission to <br />46 <br />recommend, changes to the Comprehensive Plan; a recommendation by the Planning <br />47 <br />Commission to approve a change to the Comprehensive Plan must have the affirmative <br />48 <br />votes of at least 5/7ths of the Planning Commission’s total membership. <br />49 <br />5.2The Comprehensive Plan identifies the following: <br />50 <br />Land-Use Issues <br />51 <br />The primary issue for District 10 will be continuing efforts to facilitate the <br />52 <br />redevelopment of the Twin Lakes area. Twin Lakes has been a long-term <br />53 <br />redevelopment focus of the City. A series of planning studies and environmental <br />54 <br />reviews have defined development issues and community desires for this area. While <br />55 <br />PROJ0026_RCA_CompPlanZoning_070714.doc <br />Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br />