Laserfiche WebLink
providing more flexibility and permitted uses, the change would appear to provide less <br />99 <br />control for the City to monitor new/replacement uses, which did not seem to compare to <br />100 <br />other similar situations where residential uses were adjacent to commercial/light <br />101 <br />industrial properties. The resident added that perhaps such uses or the subject properties, <br />102 <br />where residential is adjacent, should be approved through the conditional use process. <br />103 <br />6.2The Planning Commission voted, 6 – 0, to recommend approval of the Comprehensive <br />104 <br />Plan Land Use Map Change from High Density Residential to Community Mixed-Use <br />105 <br />and the Zoning Map Change from High Density Residential-1 District to Community <br />106 <br />Mixed-Use District. <br />107 <br />7.0SCCA <br />UGGESTEDITYOUNCILCTION <br />108 <br />By motion, Adopt a Resolution amending <br />Chapter 4, Land Use, of the Comprehensive <br />109 <br />Adopt an Ordinance amending <br />Plan and the Official Zoning Map; <br />110 <br />Both as provided in Section 5 ofthis staff report and on the attached Draft Resolution and <br />111 <br />Ordinance (Attachments E and F). <br />112 <br />8.0AA <br />LTERNATIVECTION <br />113 <br />Pass a motion to table the item for future action. <br /> Tabling this item does not affect the <br />114 <br />60-day action deadline established in Minn. Stat. §15.99, since it does not apply to City- <br />115 <br />initiated items. The Planning staff, however, would seek specific direction if such an <br />116 <br />action is taken. <br />117 <br />Pass a motion, to deny the requested approvals. <br /> Denial should be supported by <br />118 <br />specific findings of fact based on the City Council’s review of the application, applicable <br />119 <br />regulations, and the public record. <br />120 <br />It should be noted that the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map Change will require <br />121 <br />Metropolitan Council review and approval after the City Council acts on the request. <br />122 <br />Planning staff has been in contact with the Metropolitan Council staff and initial <br />123 <br />indications is that this amendment will be considered “minor” requiring a shorter and less <br />124 <br />rigorous process. <br />125 <br />Prepared by: City Planner Thomas Paschke <br />651-792-7074 | thomas.paschke@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Draft PC minutes <br />Attachments: A: Area map <br />D: <br />Comp Plan & Rezoning Maps <br />E: Draft resolution <br />B: <br />Open house material <br />F: Draft ordinance <br />C: <br />PROJ0026_RCA_CompPlanZoning_070714.doc <br />Page 4 of 4 <br /> <br />